|
76%
realme Narzo 30
₹10,999
(Out of Stock)
|
75%
realme Narzo 50
₹10,499
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
realme Narzo 30 vs realme Narzo 50
Comparing the realme Narzo 30 vs realme Narzo 50 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: realme Narzo 50 scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,696, while realme Narzo 30 scores 1,685, making realme Narzo 50 the better performer.
Display: realme Narzo 50 offers a screen size of 6.6 inches, while realme Narzo 30 offers 6.5 inches, making realme Narzo 50 the larger display of the two. Both realme Narzo 30 and realme Narzo 50 feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: realme Narzo 50 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 50 MP, while realme Narzo 30 offers 48 MP, making realme Narzo 50 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Both realme Narzo 30 and realme Narzo 50 feature a 16 MP primary front camera.
Battery: realme Narzo 50 delivers longer battery life with 16h 14m, while realme Narzo 30 delivers 12h 11m, making realme Narzo 50 the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Both realme Narzo 30 and realme Narzo 50 offer the same internal storage of 64 GB.
Expert Review: The editorial team rates both realme Narzo 30 and realme Narzo 50 equally at 7.
User Rating: realme Narzo 30 receives a higher user rating of 4.3, while realme Narzo 50 has a rating of 4.2.
|
✕
realme Narzo 30
₹10,999
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
realme Narzo 50
₹10,499
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
76%
|
75%
|
Release Date
|
29 Jun, 2021
|
03 Mar, 2022
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Helio G95
|
MediaTek Helio G96
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.05 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.05 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
6.6 inches (16.76 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2412 px (FHD+)
|
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
48 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
50 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
16 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
5000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
30W Dart Charging
|
33W Dart Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
UFS 2.1
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.3/5
(120,427 ratings)
|
4.2/5
(19,281 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
305,495
AnTuTu Score
|
348,006
AnTuTu Score
|
|
12h 11m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
16h 14m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Jun 29, 2021
(Official)
|
Mar 03, 2022
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v11
|
Android v11
|
Custom UI
|
Realme UI
|
Realme UI
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Helio G95
|
MediaTek Helio G96
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.05 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A76 2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Octa core
2.05 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A76 2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
12 nm
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-G76 MC4
|
Mali-G57 MC2
|
RAM
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
305,495
|
348,006
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
28.0 s
|
24.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
7.0 %
|
7.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
17.8 %
|
28.4 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
6.6 inches (16.76 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2412 px (FHD+)
|
Brightness
|
580 nits
|
480 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
90 Hz
|
120 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
405 ppi
|
400 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
83.36 %
|
84.88 %
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
90.5 %
|
90.8 %
|
Design
Height
|
162.3 mm
|
164.1 mm
|
Width
|
75.4 mm
|
75.5 mm
|
Thickness
|
9.4 mm
|
8.5 mm
|
Weight
|
192 grams
|
194 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
Back: Plastic
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
48 MP
Primary Camera10x Digital Zoomf/1.8 Wide Angle 79° field-of-view25.4 mm focal length 1/2" sensor size S5KGM1 ISOCELL Plus 0.8µm pixel size |
50 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.8 |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera21.88 mm focal length 1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera21.88 mm focal length 1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Yes
|
OIS
|
No
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
8150 x 6150 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Macro Mode |
Camera Features
|
10 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
4k @30 fps
Full HD @60 fps |
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Video Recording Features
|
N/A
|
Dual Video Recording
Ultra Steady Video |
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
16 MP
f/2.1 Wide Angle Primary Camera1/3" sensor size Exmor RS 1µm pixel size |
16 MP
f/2.05 Primary Camera1/3" sensor size |
Camera Features
|
Fixed Focus
|
N/A
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
5000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 30W Dart Charging 100% in 65 minutes
|
Yes 33W Dart Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
12h 11m
|
16h 14m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
1h 1m 57s
|
1h 0m 42s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.1
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.972 W/kg Body: 1.218 W/kg
|
Head: 1.184 W/kg Body: 0.824 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.1
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Side
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|