|
73%
realme Narzo 30A 64GB
₹10,999
(Out of Stock)
|
76%
Xiaomi Redmi A4
₹7,965
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
realme Narzo 30A 64GB vs Xiaomi Redmi A4
Comparing the realme Narzo 30A 64GB vs Xiaomi Redmi A4 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Xiaomi Redmi A4 scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,963, while realme Narzo 30A 64GB scores 1,285, making Xiaomi Redmi A4 the better performer.
Display: Xiaomi Redmi A4 offers a screen size of 6.88 inches, while realme Narzo 30A 64GB offers 6.5 inches, making Xiaomi Redmi A4 the larger display of the two. Both realme Narzo 30A 64GB and Xiaomi Redmi A4 feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Xiaomi Redmi A4 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 50 MP, while realme Narzo 30A 64GB offers 13 MP, making Xiaomi Redmi A4 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: realme Narzo 30A 64GB offers a higher front camera resolution with 8 MP, while Xiaomi Redmi A4 offers 5 MP, making realme Narzo 30A 64GB better for front camera photography.
Battery: Xiaomi Redmi A4 delivers longer battery life with 16h 28m, while realme Narzo 30A 64GB delivers 15h 33m, making Xiaomi Redmi A4 the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Both realme Narzo 30A 64GB and Xiaomi Redmi A4 offer the same internal storage of 64 GB.
Expert Review: realme Narzo 30A 64GB receives a higher expert rating of 8 from the editorial team, while Xiaomi Redmi A4 is rated 7.5.
User Rating: realme Narzo 30A 64GB receives a higher user rating of 4.4, while Xiaomi Redmi A4 has a rating of 4.2.
|
✕
realme Narzo 30A 64GB
₹10,999
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
Xiaomi Redmi A4
₹7,965
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
73%
|
76%
|
Release Date
|
24 Feb, 2021
|
27 Nov, 2024
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Helio G85
|
Snapdragon 4s Gen 2
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
| Helio G85 vs Snapdragon 4s Gen 2 | |
Display
|
|
|
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
6.88 inches (17.48 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
720x1640 px (HD+)
|
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
13 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
8 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
5 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
6000 mAh
|
5160 mAh
|
|
18W Fast Charging
|
18W Fast Charging
|
|
N/A
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
eMMC 5.1
|
UFS 2.2
|
Expert Review
|
8.0/10
|
7.5/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.4/5
(138,610 ratings)
|
4.2/5
(23,411 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
202,855
AnTuTu Score
|
381,047
AnTuTu Score
|
|
15h 33m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
16h 28m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Feb 24, 2021
(Official)
|
Nov 27, 2024
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Android v14
|
OS Updates
|
N/A
|
2 Years
|
Security Updates
|
N/A
|
4 Years
|
Custom UI
|
Realme UI
|
HyperOS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Helio G85
View Details
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4s Gen 2
View Details
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A75 1.8 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Octa core
2 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A78 1.8 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
12 nm
|
4 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-G52 MC2
|
Adreno 611
|
RAM
|
3 GB / 4 GB
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
202,855
|
381,047
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
36.0 s
|
32.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
4.0 %
|
N/A
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
45.8 %
|
N/A
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
6.88 inches (17.48 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
720x1640 px (HD+)
|
Brightness
|
570 nits
|
N/A
|
Peak Brightness
|
N/A
|
600 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
60 Hz
|
120 Hz
|
Touch Sampling Rate
|
120 Hz
|
240 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
270 ppi
|
260 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
81.7 %
|
84.18 %
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
88.7 %
|
90 %
|
Design
Height
|
164.5 mm
|
171.88 mm
|
Width
|
75.9 mm
|
77.80 mm
|
Thickness
|
9.8 mm
|
8.22 mm
|
Weight
|
207 grams
|
212.3 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
Back: Mineral Glass
|
Water Resistance
|
N/A
|
Yes Splash proof IP52
|
Ruggedness
|
N/A
|
Dust proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
13 MP
Primary Camera4x Digital Zoomf/2.2 Wide Angle 80° field-of-view25.5 mm focal length 1/3" sensor size CMOS image sensor 1.12µm pixel size |
50 MP
Primary Camera10x Digital Zoomf/1.8 Wide Angle |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera21.8 mm focal length 1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
N/A
|
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
4128 x 3096 Pixels
|
8150 x 6150 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Film Camera |
Camera Features
|
4 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Filters Touch to focus |
10 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Full HD @30 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera26 mm focal length 1/4.0" sensor size CMOS 1.12µm pixel size |
5 MP
f/2.2 Wide Angle Primary Camera |
Camera Features
|
Fixed Focus
|
N/A
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Full HD @30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
6000 mAh
|
5160 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-Polymer
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 18W Fast Charging
|
Yes 18W Fast Charging
|
Reverse Charging
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
15h 33m
|
16h 28m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
2h 53m 13s
|
1h 39m
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
32 GB / 64 GB
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
eMMC 5.1
|
UFS 2.2
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N78 |
|
N/A
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 1800(band 3) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N78 |
|
N/A
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 1800(band 3) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 1.366 W/kg Body: 1.104 W/kg
|
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
NFC
|
No
|
N/A
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Accelerometer
|