|
73%
realme XT
₹16,999
(Out of Stock)
|
76%
Moto G8 Plus
₹7,990
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
realme XT vs Moto G8 Plus
Comparing the realme XT vs Moto G8 Plus across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: realme XT scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,500, while Moto G8 Plus scores 1,303, making realme XT the better performer.
Display: realme XT offers a screen size of 6.4 inches, while Moto G8 Plus offers 6.3 inches, making realme XT the larger display of the two. realme XT features a Super AMOLED display compared to Moto G8 Plus's IPS LCD, making realme XT the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: realme XT offers a higher rear camera resolution with 64 MP, while Moto G8 Plus offers 48 MP, making realme XT better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Moto G8 Plus offers a higher front camera resolution with 25 MP, while realme XT offers 16 MP, making Moto G8 Plus better for front camera photography.
Battery: Both realme XT and Moto G8 Plus offer the same 4000 mAh battery capacity.
Storage: Both realme XT and Moto G8 Plus offer the same internal storage of 64 GB.
Expert Review: realme XT receives a higher expert rating of 8 from the editorial team, while Moto G8 Plus is rated 7.
User Rating: realme XT receives a higher user rating of 4.5, while Moto G8 Plus has a rating of 4.3.
|
✕
realme XT
₹16,999
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
Moto G8 Plus
₹7,990
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
73%
|
76%
|
Release Date
|
16 Sep, 2019
|
29 Oct, 2019
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 712
|
Snapdragon 665
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.3 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.4 inches (16.26 cm)
|
6.3 inches (16 cm)
|
|
Super AMOLED
|
IPS LCD
|
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2280 px (FHD+)
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
64 MP
Primary Camera
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Camera
|
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
5 MP
Depth Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
25 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
4000 mAh
|
4000 mAh
|
|
20W VOOC Charging
|
15W Turbo Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
N/A
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
UFS 2.1
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expert Review
|
8.0/10
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.5/5
(113,322 ratings)
|
4.3/5
(11,317 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
180,514
AnTuTu Score
|
167,968
AnTuTu Score
|
|
N/A
|
12h 33m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Sep 16, 2019
(Official)
|
Oct 29, 2019
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Custom UI
|
Realme UI
|
N/A
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Avg
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.3 GHz, Dual core, Kryo 360 1.7 GHz, Hexa Core, Kryo 360 |
Octa core
2 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 260 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 260 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
10 nm
|
11 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 616
|
Adreno 610
|
RAM
|
4 GB / 6 GB / 8 GB
|
4 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
180,514
|
167,968
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
23.0 s
|
22.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
7.0 %
|
5.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
21.9 %
|
23.8 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Best In Class
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
Super AMOLED
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.4 inches (16.26 cm)
|
6.3 inches (16 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2280 px (FHD+)
|
Aspect Ratio
|
19.5:9
|
19:9
|
Pixel Density
|
403 ppi
|
400 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
84.07 %
|
82.1 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v5
|
N/A
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
91.9 %
|
N/A
|
Design
Height
|
158.7 mm
|
158.4 mm
|
Width
|
75.2 mm
|
75.8 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.6 mm
|
9.0 mm
|
Weight
|
183 grams
|
188 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Gorilla Glass
|
Back: Plastic
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof
|
Yes Splash proof IPX2
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
64 MP
Primary Camera5x Digital Zoomf/1.85.58 mm focal length 1/1.7" sensor size S5KGW1 ISOCELL Plus 0.8µm pixel size |
48 MP
Primary Camera8x Digital Zoomf/2.0CMOS image sensor 1.6µm pixel size |
|
8 MP
f/2.25 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1.66 mm focal length 1.12µm pixel size |
16 MP
f/2.2 Wide Angle Camera |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera1.77 mm focal length 1.75µm pixel size |
5 MP
f/2.2 Depth Camera1.12µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera1.77 mm focal length 1.75µm pixel size |
N/A
|
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus Laser Autofocus
|
OIS
|
No
|
No
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
9000 x 7000 Pixels
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Burst mode |
Camera Features
|
5 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
8 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
4k @30 fps
Full HD @60 fps |
4k @30 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
16 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera25 mm focal length 1/3" sensor size Exmor RS 1µm pixel size |
25 MP
f/2.0 Primary CameraCMOS 1.8µm pixel size |
Flash
|
N/A
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
4000 mAh
|
4000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
N/A
|
Up to 34.4 Hours(2G)
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 20W VOOC Charging v3.0 52% in 30 minutes
|
Yes 15W Turbo Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
N/A
|
12h 33m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
1h 16m 22s
|
1h 46m 11s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
64 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.1
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 700(band 17) / 850(band 18) / 850(band 19) / 800(band 20) / 850(band 26) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 850(band 18) / 850(band 19) / 800(band 20) / 850(band 26) |
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Audio Features
|
Dolby Atmos
|
N/A
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
On-screen
|
Rear
|
Fingerprint Sensor Type
|
Optical
|
N/A
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|