|
77%
vivo S1 Pro
₹20,990
(Out of Stock)
|
77%
OPPO F17 Pro
₹15,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
vivo S1 Pro vs OPPO F17 Pro
Comparing the vivo S1 Pro vs OPPO F17 Pro across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: OPPO F17 Pro scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,487, while vivo S1 Pro scores 1,369, making OPPO F17 Pro the better performer.
Display: OPPO F17 Pro offers a screen size of 6.43 inches, while vivo S1 Pro offers 6.38 inches, making OPPO F17 Pro the larger display of the two. Both vivo S1 Pro and OPPO F17 Pro feature the same Super AMOLED display.
Rear Camera: Both vivo S1 Pro and OPPO F17 Pro feature a 48 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: vivo S1 Pro offers a higher front camera resolution with 32 MP, while OPPO F17 Pro offers 16 MP, making vivo S1 Pro better for front camera photography.
Battery: vivo S1 Pro delivers longer battery life with 13h 23m, while OPPO F17 Pro delivers 11h 12m, making vivo S1 Pro the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Both vivo S1 Pro and OPPO F17 Pro offer the same internal storage of 128 GB.
Expert Review: The editorial team rates both vivo S1 Pro and OPPO F17 Pro equally at 7.
User Rating: vivo S1 Pro receives a higher user rating of 4.4, while OPPO F17 Pro has a rating of 4.3.
|
✕
vivo S1 Pro
₹20,990
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
OPPO F17 Pro
₹15,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
77%
|
77%
|
Release Date
|
04 Jan, 2020
|
02 Sep, 2020
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 665
|
MediaTek Helio P95
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.2 GHz)
|
|
8 GB RAM
|
8 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.38 inches (16.21 cm)
|
6.43 inches (16.33 cm)
|
|
Super AMOLED
|
Super AMOLED
|
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
|
N/A
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
2 MP
Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
2 MP
Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
32 MP
|
16 MP + 2 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
4500 mAh
|
4015 mAh
|
|
18W Fast Charging
|
30W VOOC Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
N/A
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
eMMC
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.4/5
(38,771 ratings)
|
4.3/5
(32,184 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
172,519
AnTuTu Score
|
199,917
AnTuTu Score
|
|
13h 23m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
11h 12m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Jan 04, 2020
(Official)
|
N/A
|
Operating System
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Custom UI
|
Funtouch OS
|
ColorOS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
|
MediaTek Helio P95
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 260 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 260 |
Octa core
2.2 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A75 2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
11 nm
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 610
|
PowerVR GM9446
|
RAM
|
8 GB
|
8 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
172,519
|
199,917
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
28.0 s
|
24.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
7.0 %
|
7.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
22.7 %
|
24.8 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Best In Class
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
Super AMOLED
|
Super AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.38 inches (16.21 cm)
|
6.43 inches (16.33 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
Brightness
|
N/A
|
800 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
60 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
19.5:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
404 ppi
|
409 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
83.39 %
|
84.5 %
|
Screen Protection
|
N/A
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v3
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
90 %
|
90.67 %
|
Design
Height
|
159.2 mm
|
160.14 mm
|
Width
|
75.1 mm
|
73.77 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.6 mm
|
7.48 mm
|
Weight
|
186.7 grams
|
164 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
48 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.81/2" sensor size CMOS image sensor 0.8µm pixel size |
48 MP
Primary Camera10x Digital Zoomf/1.726 mm focal length 1/2" sensor size S5KGM1 ISOCELL Plus 0.8µm pixel size |
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera13 mm focal length |
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
2 MP
f/2.41/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
2 MP
f/2.41/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Macro Mode |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Custom Watermark Face detection Touch to focus |
10 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
3840x2160 @ 30 fps
1920x1080 @ 30 fps 1280x720 @ 240 fps |
Video Recording Features
|
N/A
|
Bokeh portrait video
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
32 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera26 mm focal length 1/2.8" sensor size CMOS 0.8µm pixel size |
16 MP
f/2.4 Wide Angle Primary Camera1/3" sensor size Exmor RS 1µm pixel size |
|
N/A
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera1.75µm pixel size |
Flash
|
Yes Screen flash
|
N/A
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
1920x1080 @ 30 fps
1280x720 @ 30 fps |
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
4500 mAh
|
4015 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-ion
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 18W Fast Charging
|
Yes 30W VOOC Charging v4.0
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
13h 23m
|
11h 12m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
1h 40m 3s
|
0h 52m 29s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
eMMC
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 1.191 W/kg Body: 0.475 W/kg
|
Head: 1.437 W/kg Body: 1.410 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.1
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
On-screen
|
On-screen
|
Fingerprint Sensor Type
|
Optical
|
Optical
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|