|
76%
vivo V20 SE
₹23,990
(Out of Stock)
|
77%
OPPO F17 Pro
₹15,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
vivo V20 SE vs OPPO F17 Pro
Comparing the vivo V20 SE vs OPPO F17 Pro across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: OPPO F17 Pro scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,487, while vivo V20 SE scores 1,377, making OPPO F17 Pro the better performer.
Display: vivo V20 SE offers a screen size of 6.44 inches, while OPPO F17 Pro offers 6.43 inches, making vivo V20 SE the larger display of the two. OPPO F17 Pro features a Super AMOLED display compared to vivo V20 SE's AMOLED, making OPPO F17 Pro the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Both vivo V20 SE and OPPO F17 Pro feature a 48 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: vivo V20 SE offers a higher front camera resolution with 32 MP, while OPPO F17 Pro offers 16 MP, making vivo V20 SE better for front camera photography.
Battery: vivo V20 SE delivers longer battery life with 11h 38m, while OPPO F17 Pro delivers 11h 12m, making vivo V20 SE the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Both vivo V20 SE and OPPO F17 Pro offer the same internal storage of 128 GB.
Expert Review: The editorial team rates both vivo V20 SE and OPPO F17 Pro equally at 7.
User Rating: vivo V20 SE and OPPO F17 Pro both receive the same user rating of 4.3.
|
✕
vivo V20 SE
₹23,990
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
OPPO F17 Pro
₹15,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
76%
|
77%
|
Release Date
|
03 Nov, 2020
|
02 Sep, 2020
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 665
|
MediaTek Helio P95
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.2 GHz)
|
|
8 GB RAM
|
8 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.44 inches (16.36 cm)
|
6.43 inches (16.33 cm)
|
|
AMOLED
|
Super AMOLED
|
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
|
N/A
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
48 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
8 MP
Wide Angle Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
2 MP
Camera
|
|
N/A
|
2 MP
Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
32 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
16 MP + 2 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
4100 mAh
|
4015 mAh
|
|
33W Flash Charging
|
30W VOOC Charging
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
N/A
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.3/5
(8,570 ratings)
|
4.3/5
(32,184 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
184,721
AnTuTu Score
|
199,917
AnTuTu Score
|
|
11h 38m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
11h 12m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Nov 03, 2020
(Official)
|
N/A
|
Operating System
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Custom UI
|
Funtouch OS
|
ColorOS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
|
MediaTek Helio P95
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 260 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 260 |
Octa core
2.2 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A75 2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
11 nm
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 610
|
PowerVR GM9446
|
RAM
|
8 GB
|
8 GB
|
RAM Type
|
N/A
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
184,721
|
199,917
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
28.0 s
|
24.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
5.0 %
|
7.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
29.7 %
|
24.8 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Best In Class
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
AMOLED
|
Super AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.44 inches (16.36 cm)
|
6.43 inches (16.33 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
Brightness
|
N/A
|
800 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
60 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
409 ppi
|
409 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
84.04 %
|
84.5 %
|
Screen Protection
|
N/A
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v3
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
90.12 %
|
90.67 %
|
Design
Height
|
161 mm
|
160.14 mm
|
Width
|
74 mm
|
73.77 mm
|
Thickness
|
7.8 mm
|
7.48 mm
|
Weight
|
171 grams
|
164 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
48 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.8 Wide Angle25 mm focal length 1/2" sensor size 0.8µm pixel size |
48 MP
Primary Camera10x Digital Zoomf/1.726 mm focal length 1/2" sensor size S5KGM1 ISOCELL Plus 0.8µm pixel size |
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Wide Angle Camera16 mm focal length 1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
2 MP
f/2.41/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
|
N/A
|
2 MP
f/2.41/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Flash
|
Yes Dual-color LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
10 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
3840x2160 @ 30 fps
1920x1080 @ 30 fps 1280x720 @ 240 fps |
Video Recording Features
|
N/A
|
Bokeh portrait video
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
32 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera1/2.8" sensor size 0.8µm pixel size |
16 MP
f/2.4 Wide Angle Primary Camera1/3" sensor size Exmor RS 1µm pixel size |
|
N/A
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera1.75µm pixel size |
Camera Features
|
Fixed Focus
|
N/A
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
1920x1080 @ 30 fps
1280x720 @ 30 fps |
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
4100 mAh
|
4015 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-ion
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 33W Flash Charging 62% in 30 minutes
|
Yes 30W VOOC Charging v4.0
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
11h 38m
|
11h 12m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
0h 54m 24s
|
0h 52m 29s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
N/A
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41) / 1900(band 39)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41) / 1900(band 39)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 1.099 W/kg Body: 0.763 W/kg
|
Head: 1.437 W/kg Body: 1.410 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.1
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
On-screen
|
On-screen
|
Fingerprint Sensor Type
|
Optical
|
Optical
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|