|
79%
vivo V20
₹27,990
(Out of Stock)
|
76%
Samsung Galaxy A31
₹23,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
vivo V20 vs Samsung Galaxy A31
Comparing the vivo V20 vs Samsung Galaxy A31 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: vivo V20 scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,637, while Samsung Galaxy A31 scores 1,175, making vivo V20 the better performer.
Display: vivo V20 offers a screen size of 6.44 inches, while Samsung Galaxy A31 offers 6.4 inches, making vivo V20 the larger display of the two. Samsung Galaxy A31 features a Super AMOLED display compared to vivo V20's AMOLED, making Samsung Galaxy A31 the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: vivo V20 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 64 MP, while Samsung Galaxy A31 offers 48 MP, making vivo V20 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: vivo V20 offers a higher front camera resolution with 44 MP, while Samsung Galaxy A31 offers 20 MP, making vivo V20 better for front camera photography.
Battery: vivo V20 delivers longer battery life with 16h 51m, while Samsung Galaxy A31 delivers 14h 00m, making vivo V20 the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Both vivo V20 and Samsung Galaxy A31 offer the same internal storage of 128 GB.
Expert Review: The editorial team rates both vivo V20 and Samsung Galaxy A31 equally at 7.
User Rating: vivo V20 receives a higher user rating of 4.4, while Samsung Galaxy A31 has a rating of 4.3.
|
✕
vivo V20
₹27,990
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
Samsung Galaxy A31
₹23,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
79%
|
76%
|
Release Date
|
12 Oct, 2020
|
04 Jun, 2020
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 720G
|
MediaTek Helio P65
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.3 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
|
8 GB RAM
|
6 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.44 inches (16.36 cm)
|
6.4 inches (16.26 cm)
|
|
AMOLED
|
Super AMOLED
|
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
64 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
2 MP
Mono Camera
|
5 MP
Macro Camera
|
|
N/A
|
5 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
44 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
20 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
4000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
33W Flash Charging
|
15W Fast Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.4/5
(23,600 ratings)
|
4.3/5
(17,260 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
282,796
AnTuTu Score
|
152,476
AnTuTu Score
|
|
16h 51m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
14h 00m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Oct 12, 2020
(Official)
|
Jun 04, 2020
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v11
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Custom UI
|
Funtouch OS
|
Samsung One UI
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
|
MediaTek Helio P65
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.3 GHz, Dual core, Kryo 465 1.8 GHz, Hexa Core, Kryo 465 |
Octa core
2 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A75 1.7 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
8 nm
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 618
|
Mali-G52
|
RAM
|
8 GB
|
6 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
282,796
|
152,476
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
25.0 s
|
31.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
6.0 %
|
6.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
24.2 %
|
6.9 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
AMOLED
|
Super AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.44 inches (16.36 cm)
|
6.4 inches (16.26 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
Refresh Rate
|
60 Hz
|
60 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
409 ppi
|
411 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
83.66 %
|
84.92 %
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes with notch
|
HDR 10 / HDR+ Support
|
Yes HDR 10+
|
N/A
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
90.37 %
|
N/A
|
Design
Height
|
161.3 mm
|
159.3 mm
|
Width
|
74.2 mm
|
73.1 mm
|
Thickness
|
7.3 mm
|
8.6 mm
|
Weight
|
171 grams
|
185 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Mineral Glass
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
64 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.89 Wide Angle26 mm focal length 1/1.7" sensor size 0.8µm pixel size |
48 MP
Primary Camera8x Digital Zoomf/2.026 mm focal length 1/2" sensor size 0.8µm pixel size |
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera16 mm focal length 1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Mono Camera |
5 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera |
|
N/A
|
5 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Yes
|
OIS
|
N/A
|
No
|
Flash
|
Yes Dual-color LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
9000 x 7000 Pixels
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
8 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
4k @30 fps
Full HD @60 fps |
Full HD @30 fps
|
Video Recording Features
|
Bokeh portrait video
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
44 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera |
20 MP
f/2.2 Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
N/A
|
No
|
Flash
|
Yes Screen flash
|
No
|
Video Recording
|
4k @30 fps
Full HD @30 fps |
Full HD @30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
4000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
N/A
|
Up to 33 Hours(4G)
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 33W Flash Charging
|
Yes 15W Fast Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
16h 51m
|
14h 00m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
0h 40m 33s
|
1h 45m 14s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
128 GB / 256 GB
|
128 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 700(band 13) / 700(band 17) / 800(band 20) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 700(band 13) / 700(band 17) / 800(band 20) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.89 W/kg Body: 0.49 W/kg
|
Head: 1.13 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.1
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Audio Features
|
N/A
|
Dolby Atmos
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
On-screen
|
On-screen
|
Fingerprint Sensor Type
|
Optical
|
Optical
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|