|
81%
vivo X50
₹39,990
(Out of Stock)
|
77%
OPPO F17 Pro
₹15,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
vivo X50 vs OPPO F17 Pro
Comparing the vivo X50 vs OPPO F17 Pro across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: vivo X50 scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,780, while OPPO F17 Pro scores 1,487, making vivo X50 the better performer.
Display: vivo X50 offers a screen size of 6.56 inches, while OPPO F17 Pro offers 6.43 inches, making vivo X50 the larger display of the two. OPPO F17 Pro features a Super AMOLED display compared to vivo X50's AMOLED, making OPPO F17 Pro the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Both vivo X50 and OPPO F17 Pro feature a 48 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: vivo X50 offers a higher front camera resolution with 32 MP, while OPPO F17 Pro offers 16 MP, making vivo X50 better for front camera photography.
Battery: vivo X50 offers a higher battery capacity with 4200 mAh, while OPPO F17 Pro offers 4015 mAh, making vivo X50 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both vivo X50 and OPPO F17 Pro offer the same internal storage of 128 GB.
Expert Review: The editorial team rates both vivo X50 and OPPO F17 Pro equally at 7.
User Rating: vivo X50 and OPPO F17 Pro both receive the same user rating of 4.3.
|
✕
vivo X50
₹39,990
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
OPPO F17 Pro
₹15,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
81%
|
77%
|
Release Date
|
24 Jul, 2020
|
02 Sep, 2020
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 730
|
MediaTek Helio P95
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.2 GHz)
|
|
8 GB RAM
|
8 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.56 inches (16.66 cm)
|
6.43 inches (16.33 cm)
|
|
AMOLED
|
Super AMOLED
|
|
1080x2376 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
48 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
13 MP
Depth Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
2 MP
Camera
|
|
5 MP
Macro Camera
|
2 MP
Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
32 MP
|
16 MP + 2 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
4200 mAh
|
4015 mAh
|
|
33W Flash Charging
|
30W VOOC Charging
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
UFS 2.1
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.3/5
(2,567 ratings)
|
4.3/5
(32,184 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
281,854
AnTuTu Score
|
199,917
AnTuTu Score
|
|
N/A
|
11h 12m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Jul 24, 2020
(Official)
|
N/A
|
Operating System
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Custom UI
|
Funtouch OS
|
ColorOS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
|
MediaTek Helio P95
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.2 GHz, Dual core, Kryo 470 1.8 GHz, Hexa Core, Kryo 470 |
Octa core
2.2 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A75 2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
8 nm
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 618
|
PowerVR GM9446
|
RAM
|
8 GB
|
8 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
281,854
|
199,917
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
25.0 s
|
24.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
7.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
24.8 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
AMOLED
|
Super AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.56 inches (16.66 cm)
|
6.43 inches (16.33 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2376 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
Brightness
|
N/A
|
800 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
90 Hz
|
60 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
19.8:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
398 ppi
|
409 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
86.51 %
|
84.5 %
|
Screen Protection
|
N/A
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v3
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
HDR 10 / HDR+ Support
|
Yes HDR 10+
|
N/A
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
92.8 %
|
90.67 %
|
Design
Height
|
159.5 mm
|
160.14 mm
|
Width
|
75.3 mm
|
73.77 mm
|
Thickness
|
7.5 mm
|
7.48 mm
|
Weight
|
173 grams
|
164 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Mineral Glass
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
48 MP
Primary Camera20x Digital Zoomf/1.6 Wide AngleIMX598 Exmor-RS CMOS Sensor |
48 MP
Primary Camera10x Digital Zoomf/1.726 mm focal length 1/2" sensor size S5KGM1 ISOCELL Plus 0.8µm pixel size |
|
13 MP
f/2.46 Depth Camera50 mm focal length |
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera16 mm focal length 1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
2 MP
f/2.41/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
|
5 MP
f/2.48 Macro Camera |
2 MP
f/2.41/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
OIS
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
20 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
10 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
4k @30 fps
|
3840x2160 @ 30 fps
1920x1080 @ 30 fps 1280x720 @ 240 fps |
Video Recording Features
|
N/A
|
Bokeh portrait video
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
32 MP
f/2.45 Primary Camera26 mm focal length 1/2.8" sensor size 0.8µm pixel size |
16 MP
f/2.4 Wide Angle Primary Camera1/3" sensor size Exmor RS 1µm pixel size |
|
N/A
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera1.75µm pixel size |
Flash
|
Yes Soft light flash
|
N/A
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
1920x1080 @ 30 fps
1280x720 @ 30 fps |
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
4200 mAh
|
4015 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 33W Flash Charging v2.0
|
Yes 30W VOOC Charging v4.0
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
N/A
|
11h 12m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
1h 17m 32s
|
0h 52m 29s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
128 GB / 256 GB
|
128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.1
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
No
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 1.24 W/kg Body: 0.39 W/kg
|
Head: 1.437 W/kg Body: 1.410 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.1
|
Yes v5.1
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
USB Type-C
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
On-screen
|
On-screen
|
Fingerprint Sensor Type
|
Optical
|
Optical
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|