1. Coolpad is one of the major brands in the Chinese domestic market. It primarily focuses on introducing budget smartphones with good specs.
2. Coolpad has a near about 350 walk-in service centers accross India. Toll-free number. 1800 102 7159
|
|
|
|
RAM | 64 MB |
Rear Camera | 2 MP |
Battery | 1200 mAh |
Display | 2.8 inches (7.11 cm) |
Operating System | Windows Mobile |
RAM | 64 MB |
Display Type | LCD |
Screen Size | 2.8 inches (7.11 cm) |
Resolution | 320 x 240 pixels |
Pixel Density | 143 ppi |
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated) | 42.16 % |
Height | 98 mm Compare Size |
Width | 58.8 mm |
Thickness | 16.00 mm |
Weight | 117 grams |
Main Camera | ||
Camera Setup | Single | |
Resolution |
2 MP, Primary Camera |
|
Flash | Yes | |
Camera Features |
Digital Zoom Smile detection |
Capacity | 1200 mAh |
Type | Li-ion |
Standby time | Up to 200(2G) |
Internal Memory | 256 MB |
Expandable Memory | Yes |
SIM Slot(s) | Single SIM, GSM |
Network Support | 5G Not Supported in India, 2G |
SIM 1 |
GPRS: Available EDGE: Available
|
Wi-Fi | No |
Bluetooth | Yes |
Larger screen:
4.00 inches (10.16 cm) vs 2.80 inches (7.11 cm)
Higher primary camera resolution:
5 MP vs 2 MP
Higher battery capacity:
1700 mAH vs 1200 mAH
Larger screen:
3.50 inches (8.89 cm) vs 2.80 inches (7.11 cm)
Higher battery capacity:
1400 mAH vs 1200 mAH
Lower primary camera resolution:
1.3 MP vs 2 MP
More SIM card slots:
2 vs 1
Lesser thickness:
15 mm vs 16 mm
Lesser weight:
76 grams vs 117 grams
Higher pixel density:
154 ppi vs 143 ppi
Lesser thickness:
13.5 mm vs 16 mm
Lesser weight:
94 grams vs 117 grams
Higher pixel density:
157 ppi vs 143 ppi
Lesser weight:
105 grams vs 117 grams
Smaller screen :
1.80 inches (4.57 cm) vs 2.80 inches (7.11 cm)
Higher pixel density:
167 ppi vs 143 ppi
Lesser thickness:
12.8 mm vs 16 mm
Lesser weight:
91.3 grams vs 117 grams
Rs 25,990