|
76%
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
₹15,849
@Amazon
|
69%
Itel Zeno 100 Pro 4G
₹8,599
@Amazon
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G vs Itel Zeno 100 Pro 4G
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G vs Itel Zeno 100 Pro 4G across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G runs at a higher processing speed of 2.4 GHz, while Itel Zeno 100 Pro 4G runs at 1.8 GHz, making Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G the better performer.
Display: Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G offers a screen size of 6.7 inches, while Itel Zeno 100 Pro 4G offers 6.56 inches, making Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G the larger display of the two. Itel Zeno 100 Pro 4G features a IPS LCD display compared to Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G's LCD, making Itel Zeno 100 Pro 4G the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G offers a higher rear camera resolution with 50 MP, while Itel Zeno 100 Pro 4G offers 8 MP, making Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G offers a higher front camera resolution with 8 MP, while Itel Zeno 100 Pro 4G offers 5 MP, making Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G better for front camera photography.
Battery: Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G offers a higher battery capacity with 6000 mAh, while Itel Zeno 100 Pro 4G offers 5000 mAh, making Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G better for longer battery life.
Storage: Itel Zeno 100 Pro 4G offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G offers 128 GB, making Itel Zeno 100 Pro 4G the better option for storage.
User Rating: Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G receives a higher user rating of 4.1, while Itel Zeno 100 Pro 4G has a rating of 3.4.
|
✕
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
₹15,849
@ Amazon
|
✕
Itel Zeno 100 Pro 4G
₹8,599
@ Amazon
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
76%
|
69%
|
Release Date
|
02 2026
|
07 2026
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Dimensity 6300
|
Unisoc T7100
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.4 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 1.8 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
3 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.7 inches (17.02 cm)
|
6.56 inches (16.66 cm)
|
|
LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
720x1612 px (HD+)
|
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
8 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
5 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
6000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
25W Fast Charging
|
10W
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
eMMC 5.1
|
eMMC 5.0
|
Expert Review
|
8.2/10
|
N/A
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.1/5
(10,060 ratings)
|
3.4/5
(5 ratings)
|
Compare Prices
|
₹15,849
@ Amazon
|
₹8,599
@ Amazon
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
February 9, 2026
(Official)
|
July 16, 2026
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v16
|
Android v15
|
OS Updates
|
6 Years
|
N/A
|
Security Updates
|
6 Years
|
N/A
|
Custom UI
|
Samsung One UI
|
Android Go
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Dimensity 6300 MT6835
|
Unisoc T7100
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.4 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A76 2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Octa core
1.8 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A75 1.2 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
6 nm
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-G57 MC2
|
PowerVR GE8322
|
RAM
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
3 GB / 4 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
532,024
|
N/A
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
30.0 s
|
N/A
|
Gaming Test Results
Wild Life Extreme (The higher, the better) Wild Life Extreme is a classic mobile benchmark; it renders in 4K to test the peak performance of a wide range of devices.
|
373
|
N/A
|
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
9.0 %
|
N/A
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
32.6 %
|
N/A
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.7 inches (17.02 cm)
|
6.56 inches (16.66 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
720x1612 px (HD+)
|
Peak Brightness
|
800 nits
|
N/A
|
Brightness
|
N/A
|
400 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz
|
90 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
N/A
|
Pixel Density
|
260 ppi
|
269 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
83.65 %
|
N/A
|
Screen Protection
|
No
|
Yes
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with notch
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Design
Height
|
167.4 mm
|
N/A
|
Width
|
77.4 mm
|
N/A
|
Thickness
|
8.2 mm
|
8.49 mm
|
Weight
|
191 grams
|
N/A
|
Build Material
|
Back: Leather Plastic
|
N/A
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof IP54
|
N/A
|
Ruggedness
|
Dust proof
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
50 MP
Primary Camera10x Digital Zoomf/1.8 Wide Angle1/2.76" sensor size 0.64µm pixel size |
8 MP
Primary Cameraf/2GC08A8 1.12µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
N/A
|
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
OIS
|
No
|
No
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8160 x 6120 Pixels
|
N/A
|
Camera Features
|
10 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash |
Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
HD @120 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera26 mm focal length 1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
5 MP
f/2.2 Primary Camera1.12µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
No
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
No
|
No
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
6000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
N/A
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 25W Fast Charging
|
Yes 10W
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
12h 51m
|
N/A
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
1h 14m
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
128 GB
|
64 GB
|
Storage Type
|
eMMC 5.1
|
eMMC 5.0
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 1.5 TB
|
Yes
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.24 W/kg
|
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.3
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
N/A
|
IR Blaster
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
N/A
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Side
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Accelerometer
|
Compare Prices
|
₹15,849
@ Amazon
|
₹8,599
@ Amazon
|
Related Comparisons
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
Samsung Galaxy M17 5G
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
Samsung Galaxy A07 5G
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
Moto G37 Power 5G
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
Samsung Galaxy M06 5G
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
Samsung Galaxy F17 5G
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
Samsung Galaxy F16 5G
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
Samsung Galaxy F06 5G
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
Xiaomi Redmi A7 Pro 5G
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
Samsung Galaxy M36
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
Samsung Galaxy M47 5G
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
Moto G37 5G
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
Samsung Galaxy A06 5G
Itel Zeno 100 Pro 4G
vivo T4X
Itel Zeno 100 Pro 4G
Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G
Itel Zeno 100 Pro 4G
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
Itel Zeno 100 Pro 4G
OnePlus N6 5G
Itel Zeno 100 Pro 4G
vivo X300 Ultra
Itel Zeno 100 Pro 4G
Samsung Galaxy M17 5G
Itel Zeno 100 Pro 4G
POCO M7 Pro