|
80%
vivo T4X
₹16,999
@Flipkart
|
69%
Itel Zeno 100 Pro 4G
₹8,599
@Amazon
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
vivo T4X vs Itel Zeno 100 Pro 4G
Comparing the vivo T4X vs Itel Zeno 100 Pro 4G across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: vivo T4X runs at a higher processing speed of 2.5 GHz, while Itel Zeno 100 Pro 4G runs at 1.8 GHz, making vivo T4X the better performer.
Display: vivo T4X offers a screen size of 6.72 inches, while Itel Zeno 100 Pro 4G offers 6.56 inches, making vivo T4X the larger display of the two. Itel Zeno 100 Pro 4G features a IPS LCD display compared to vivo T4X's LCD, making Itel Zeno 100 Pro 4G the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: vivo T4X offers a higher rear camera resolution with 50 MP, while Itel Zeno 100 Pro 4G offers 8 MP, making vivo T4X better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: vivo T4X offers a higher front camera resolution with 8 MP, while Itel Zeno 100 Pro 4G offers 5 MP, making vivo T4X better for front camera photography.
Battery: vivo T4X offers a higher battery capacity with 6500 mAh, while Itel Zeno 100 Pro 4G offers 5000 mAh, making vivo T4X better for longer battery life.
Storage: Itel Zeno 100 Pro 4G offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while vivo T4X offers 128 GB, making Itel Zeno 100 Pro 4G the better option for storage.
User Rating: vivo T4X receives a higher user rating of 4.4, while Itel Zeno 100 Pro 4G has a rating of 3.4.
|
vivo T4X
₹16,999
@ Flipkart
|
Itel Zeno 100 Pro 4G
₹8,599
@ Amazon
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
80%
|
69%
|
Release Date
|
03 2025
|
07 2026
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Dimensity 7300
|
Unisoc T7100
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.5 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 1.8 GHz)
|
|
6 GB RAM
|
3 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.72 inches (17.07 cm)
|
6.56 inches (16.66 cm)
|
|
LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
1080x2408 px (FHD+)
|
720x1612 px (HD+)
|
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
8 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
5 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
6500 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
44W Flash Charging
|
10W
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
UFS 3.1
|
eMMC 5.0
|
Expert Review
|
8.0/10
|
N/A
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.4/5
(177,982 ratings)
|
3.4/5
(5 ratings)
|
Compare Prices
|
₹16,999
@ Flipkart
|
₹8,599
@ Amazon
|
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
March 12, 2025
(Official)
|
July 16, 2026
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v15
|
Android v15
|
OS Updates
|
2 Years
|
N/A
|
Security Updates
|
3 Years
|
N/A
|
Custom UI
|
Funtouch OS
|
Android Go
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Very Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Dimensity 7300
|
Unisoc T7100
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.5 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A78 2 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A55 |
Octa core
1.8 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A75 1.2 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
4 nm
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-G615 MC2
|
PowerVR GE8322
|
RAM
|
6 GB / 8 GB
|
3 GB / 4 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
685,052
|
N/A
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
26.0 s
|
N/A
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
6.0 %
|
N/A
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
24.8 %
|
N/A
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.72 inches (17.07 cm)
|
6.56 inches (16.66 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2408 px (FHD+)
|
720x1612 px (HD+)
|
Peak Brightness
|
1050 nits
|
N/A
|
Brightness
|
N/A
|
400 nits
|
HBM Brightness
|
1050 nits
|
N/A
|
Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz
|
90 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
N/A
|
Pixel Density
|
393 ppi
|
269 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
86.24 %
|
N/A
|
Screen Protection
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Design
Height
|
165.70 mm
|
N/A
|
Width
|
76.30 mm
|
N/A
|
Thickness
|
8.09 mm
|
8.49 mm
|
Weight
|
204 grams
|
N/A
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
N/A
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof IP64
|
N/A
|
Ruggedness
|
Dust proof
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
50 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.8 Wide Angle |
8 MP
Primary Cameraf/2GC08A8 1.12µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
N/A
|
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
OIS
|
No
|
No
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8150 x 6150 Pixels
|
N/A
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
N/A
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
N/A
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
4k @30 fps
Full HD @30 fps |
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
f/2.05 Wide Angle Primary Camera |
5 MP
f/2.2 Primary Camera1.12µm pixel size |
Flash
|
N/A
|
No
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
N/A
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Excellent
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
6500 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
N/A
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 44W Flash Charging 50% in 40 minutes
|
Yes 10W
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
14h 11m
|
N/A
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
1h 7m 40s
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
128 GB / 256 GB
|
64 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 3.1
|
eMMC 5.0
|
Expandable Storage
|
No
|
Yes
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N77 / N78 |
N/A
|
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
N/A
|
SIM 2
|
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N77 / N78 |
N/A
|
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
N/A
|
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.985 W/kg Body: 0.936 W/kg
|
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.4
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
N/A
|
IR Blaster
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Stereo Speakers
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Audio Jack
|
USB Type-C
|
N/A
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Side
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Accelerometer
|
Compare Prices
|
₹16,999
@ Flipkart
|
₹8,599
@ Amazon
|
Related Comparisons
vivo T4X
realme P3
vivo T4X
vivo T5x
vivo T4X
POCO M7 Pro
vivo T4X
Moto G86 Power
vivo T4X
iQOO Z10x
vivo T4X
vivo T5 Lite 5G
vivo T4X
OPPO K13 5G
vivo T4X
vivo Y31 5G
vivo T4X
realme P4x
vivo T4X
iQOO Z10 Lite
vivo T4X
vivo T4
vivo T4X
vivo T4 Lite
vivo T4X
vivo Y29 5G
vivo T4X
Infinix Note 50X
vivo T4X
OPPO K14x 5G
Itel Zeno 100 Pro 4G
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
Itel Zeno 100 Pro 4G
Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G
Itel Zeno 100 Pro 4G
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
Itel Zeno 100 Pro 4G
OnePlus N6 5G
Itel Zeno 100 Pro 4G
vivo X300 Ultra
Itel Zeno 100 Pro 4G
Samsung Galaxy M17 5G
Itel Zeno 100 Pro 4G
POCO M7 Pro