1. Trusted Brand
2. HTC has over 200 service locations spread over India covering most major cities. Toll Free Number: 18002663566
|
|
|
|
MAX?????????!!! Well only in terms of size!!!!! The phone would have been a winner if it was launched in 2012!!!! Well ITS 2013 and almost 2014! HTC should grow up.nLet's go in for a detailed review.nPROS:n1)5.9" FULL HD Display.Great for viewing multimedia content and playing HD games like Asphalt 8 airborne, Men In Black etc.n2)DUAL BOOMSOUND Stereo Speaker.Great for loud audio.Sound is significantly better than Samsung Galaxies!n3)Fingerprint Scanner(Its cheaper than iPhone 5S).iPhone 5S is at whooping 70k+ (for the gold version)n4)Expandable storage compared to the HTC One.n5)FULL HD recording on secondary camera(2.1 Megapixel).HDR is also present.nCONS:n1)Snapdragon 600 in times when already a better chipset in the form of Snapdragon 800 is available in the market.AnTuTu Benchmark scores is around 27k which is just better than HTC One and significantly lower than Snapdragon 800 powered mobiles like Sony Xperia Z1 and LG G2.n2)4mp UltraPixel Camera. Well this is actually a marketing gimmick. The ultrapixel actually allows more light to enter by using bigger pixels for the camera. But resolution remains low which results into very low details.Its good for low light due to the absorption of more light but on a day to day to standard, it stinks.n3)No Optical Image Stabilization. This is bad when your upgrading something with a term MAX. The HTC One only has the stabilization of the One family. n4)No Beats audio. Beats audio is actually a software optimization. Audio quality is good but could have been better.n5)PRICE-GALAXY NOTE 3 has better hardware in all respects. Available at much cheaper price. (Almost 10k less)nnALL IN ALL this phone is good but definitely not the best. Humongous price,Older chipset,low resolution camera just doesn't make it some up to a good note. LUMIA 1520 will be coming out soon. Its better to wait for that that to spend a fortune on this.If you are a HTC fan, wait for the price to drop. It will take maximum 4 months to subsidize in a large amount. CHEERS ! !
While Samsung for sure thinks Indians are fools, HTC has also joind the club, sub flagship specs and a cost of 53K shall definitely deter this phone from being on top. I got this phone for my brother from elsewhere, at first it might impress you but don't be fooled test the phone to its true capacity after-all you don't pay 53K for just normal work. nPros-n1 good displayn2 good battery performance.nCons-n1 laggy processorn2 UI is quite poorn3 Camera does not perform up to the mark, samsung is better at thisn4 music is below average, sony phones in range of 20/30K do it betternGiving a last generation processor for huge cost is totally a bad idea from HTC. While competition offers much good features at lower prices with better quality, one has to just guess what was in HTC's mind while designing this phone.
RAM | 2 GB |
Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 APQ8064T |
Rear Camera | 4 UP |
Front Camera | 2.1 MP |
Battery | 3300 mAh |
Display | 5.9 inches (14.99 cm) |
Operating System | Android v4.3 (Jelly Bean) |
Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 APQ8064T |
CPU | Quad core, 1.7 GHz, Krait 300 |
Graphics | Adreno 320 |
RAM |
2 GB
Very Good
|
Display Type | S-LCD 3 |
Screen Size | 5.9 inches (14.99 cm) |
Resolution | 1080x1920 px (FULL HD) |
Pixel Density |
373 ppi
Excellent
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated) | 70.55 % |
Touch Screen | Yes, Capacitive Touchscreen, Multi-touch |
Height | 164.5 mm Compare Size |
Width | 82.5 mm |
Thickness |
10.29 mm
Average
|
Weight |
217 grams
Poor
|
Build Material | Case: Aluminium |
Colours | Black, Gold, Silver |
Main Camera | ||
Camera Setup | Single | |
Resolution |
4 UP, Primary Camera |
|
Autofocus | Yes | |
Flash | Yes, LED Flash | |
Image Resolution | 2688 x 1520 Pixels | |
Shooting Modes | High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) | |
Camera Features |
Digital Zoom Digital image stabilization Face detection Simultaneous HD video and image recording Smile detection |
|
Video Recording |
1920x1080 @ 30 fps 1280x720 @ 60 fps |
|
Video Recording Features | Stereo recording | |
Front Camera | ||
Camera Setup | Single | |
Resolution |
2.1 MP, Primary Camera |
Capacity | 3300 mAh |
Type | Li-Polymer |
Removable | No |
TalkTime | Up to 25 Hours(3G) |
Standby time | Up to 585 Hours(3G) |
Internal Memory |
32 GB
Excellent
|
Expandable Memory | Yes, Up to 64 GB |
SIM Slot(s) | Single SIM, GSM |
SIM Size | SIM1: Micro |
Network Support | 5G Not Supported in India, 4G Not Supported in India, 3G, 2G |
SIM 1 |
4G Bands: FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) 3G Bands: UMTS 1900 / 2100 / 850 / 900 MHz 2G Bands: GSM 1800 / 1900 / 850 / 900 MHz 4G Speed: 50 Mbit/s ↑ 100 Mbit/s ↓ (LTE category 3) GPRS: Available EDGE: Available
|
Wi-Fi | Yes, Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
Wi-Fi Features | Wi-Fi Direct, Mobile Hotspot |
Bluetooth | Yes, v4.0 |
GPS | Yes with A-GPS |
USB Connectivity | Mass storage device, USB charging, microUSB 2.0 |
Mobile High-Definition Link(MHL) | Yes |
Loudspeaker | Yes |
Audio Jack | 3.5 mm |
Fingerprint Sensor | Yes |
Other Sensors | Light sensor, Proximity sensor, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope |
Larger screen:
6.40 inches (16.26 cm) vs 5.90 inches (14.99 cm)
More RAM:
3 GB vs 2 GB
Higher primary camera resolution:
16 MP vs 4 MP
Higher pixel density:
469 ppi vs 373 ppi
Lesser thickness:
9.3 mm vs 10.29 mm
Lesser weight:
143 grams vs 217 grams
Higher primary camera resolution:
13 MP vs 4 MP
Higher secondary camera resolution:
5 MP vs 2.1 MP
Lesser thickness:
9.4 mm vs 10.29 mm
Faster processor:
Quad core 1.8 GHz vs Quad core 1.7 GHz
More RAM:
4 GB vs 2 GB
Higher primary camera resolution:
20 MP vs 4 MP
Faster processor:
Octa core 1.5 GHz vs Quad core 1.7 GHz
More RAM:
3 GB vs 2 GB
Higher primary camera resolution:
13 MP vs 4 MP
Higher primary camera resolution:
13 MP vs 4 MP
More SIM card slots:
2 vs 1
More expandable memory:
128 GB vs 64 GB
Rs 24,299