INFO

SPECS

PHOTOS

COMPETITORS

Kyocera Tempo E2000

+ Compare

View All Photos (5)

Kyocera Tempo E2000 is permanently discontinued.

Key Specs

Brew

Display

2 inches (5.08 cm); LCD
176x220 px

Rear Camera

Single Camera Setup
- 1.3 MP Primary Camera

Battery

900 mAh

General

5G Not Supported

Add To Compare See Full Specs

Competitors For Kyocera Tempo E2000

View Alternatives

Olive Wiz V-GC800

Discontinued ₹2,999

This Competitor Has

Higher Rear Camera Resolution: 2 MP vs 1 MP

Larger Screen: 2.2" (5.59 cm) vs 2" (5.08 cm)

Higher Battery Capacity: 1100 mAH vs 900 mAH

Kyocera Tempo E2000 VS Olive Wiz V-GC800

Videocon V1705

Discontinued

This Competitor Has

Higher Rear Camera Resolution: 3 MP vs 1 MP

Larger Screen: 2.4" (6.1 cm) vs 2" (5.08 cm)

Higher Battery Capacity: 1000 mAH vs 900 mAH

Kyocera Tempo E2000 VS Videocon V1705

Kyocera Topaz KX7

Discontinued

This Competitor Has

Lower Weight: 95 grams vs 100 grams

Kyocera Tempo E2000 VS Kyocera Topaz KX7

Lava Iris 406q

Discontinued ₹5,299

This Competitor Has

Higher Rear Camera Resolution: 5 MP vs 1 MP

Larger Screen: 4" (10.16 cm) vs 2" (5.08 cm)

Higher Battery Capacity: 1700 mAH vs 900 mAH

Kyocera Tempo E2000 VS Lava Iris 406q

Nokia E72

Discontinued ₹6,999

This Competitor Has

Higher Rear Camera Resolution: 5 MP vs 1 MP

Larger Screen: 2.4" (6.1 cm) vs 2" (5.08 cm)

Higher Battery Capacity: 1500 mAH vs 900 mAH

Kyocera Tempo E2000 VS Nokia E72

Nokia E71

Discontinued ₹14,999

This Competitor Has

Higher Rear Camera Resolution: 2 MP vs 1 MP

Larger Screen: 2.4" (6.1 cm) vs 2" (5.08 cm)

Higher Battery Capacity: 1500 mAH vs 900 mAH

Kyocera Tempo E2000 VS Nokia E71

Kyocera Neo E1100

Discontinued

This Competitor Has

Larger Screen: 2.2" (5.59 cm) vs 2" (5.08 cm)

Better Display: OLED vs LCD

Lower Weight: 90 grams vs 100 grams

Kyocera Tempo E2000 VS Kyocera Neo E1100

LG KF300

Discontinued

This Competitor Has

Higher Rear Camera Resolution: 2 MP vs 1 MP

Lower Weight: 97 grams vs 100 grams

Kyocera Tempo E2000 VS LG KF300

Alcatel OT-363

Discontinued

This Competitor Has

Lower Weight: 73 grams vs 100 grams

Lower Rear Camera Resolution: 0 MP vs 1 MP

Kyocera Tempo E2000 VS Alcatel OT-363

Kyocera Mako S4000

Discontinued

This Competitor Has

Lower Weight: 82.6 grams vs 100 grams

Lower Rear Camera Resolution: 0 MP vs 1 MP

Smaller Screen: 1.8" (4.57 cm) vs 2" (5.08 cm)

Kyocera Tempo E2000 VS Kyocera Mako S4000

Kyocera Tempo E2000 Specifications

General Display Design Rear Camera Battery Storage Network & Connectivity Multimedia Sensors

General
Operating System	Brew

Display
Display Type	LCD
Screen Size	2 inches (5.08 cm)
Resolution	176x220 px
Pixel Density	141 ppi
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)	27.2 %

Design
Height	89 mm
Width	52 mm
Thickness	16.50 mm
Weight	100 grams
Form Factor	Clamshell

Rear Camera

Resolution

Camera	MP
Primary	1.3 MP

Flash

Yes

Camera Features

Digital Zoom
Smile detection

Battery
Capacity	900 mAh
Battery Type	Li-ion
TalkTime	Up to 3.5(2G)

Storage
Expandable Storage	Yes, Up to 2 GB

Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)	Single SIM
Network Support	5G Not Supported
Wi-Fi	No
Bluetooth	Yes, v1.2
GPS	Yes

Multimedia
Music	Yes, Music Formats: Yes, Music Formats : MP3, AAC

Sensors
Browser	Yes
Phone Book	Yes
Other Facilities	On-screen icons, Screen savers, Wallpaper, Alarm Clock, Calculator, Memo pad, Predictive text-input software for rapid text entry, Scheduler, Side volume controls, Speed dialing, Stopwatch, Tip calculator, To-do list, Voice recognition (advanced), World clock, Multiple language options, Voice-activated dialing, Voice memo.

            Kyocera  Tempo E2000 Key Highlights
            
                  Display
                  2", 176 x 220 Resolution
               
                  Rear Camera
                  1.3 MP
               
                  Battery
                  900 mAh