1. Trusted Brand
2. Setup in 2012, XOLO is an Indian brand which primarily deals in mid-range Android smartphones. It is owned by Lava International.
3. Xolo has over 1200 service centres in India. Toll Free Number: 180030100104
Official Website
|
|
|
|
Best device from Xolo with an ideal price tag. Sample comparison with MotoGnnXOLO Q1010 vs MotoG n1. Display : 5 inch HD IPS OGS display > than 4.5 inch HD IPS (OGS nd large display to play games & watch movies) n2. Processor : 1.3 MTK6582 = 1.2 Snapdragon 400n3. GPU : 500Mhz mali-400MP2 >= 450Mhz Adreno 305n4. RAM: 1 GB = 1 GBn5. Battery : 2250 mAH =< 2070mAH (due to optimizations, MotoG provides better backup. but 19Hour backup of Q1010 is also exceptional)n6. Memory : put 1000rs nd buy a 32GB microSD so 36GB > 16GBn7. Camera : Xolo's 8MP shooters are gud > 5MP MotoG( and FHD video recordng vs HD)n7. Thickness : 8.3mm vs 11.6 (is this a brick ? :P)n8. Service centers : Both have pathetic service centers (YES Equal here)n9. Both have OTG, Wifi DirectnnIn my opinion the major drawback of MotoG is the lack of MicroSD slot. 12.5 GB is really insufficient for me. I'm a hardcore gamer and MotoGs GPU is very good, but the 500Mhz Mali-400MP2 in Q1010 is also very good and here i can use MicroSD card to store my large game data too. OGS is really good while comparing to normal IPS screens, it provides wider viewing angles. nVerdict : nIf you are a hardcore gamer go for Xolo Q1010 (bcoz of the lack of sufficient memory in motog)nIf you are a typical cell phone user , ie making lots of lengthy calls per day, and use mobile in rough environments go for MotoG (better battery backup + Gorilla Glass protection)
freinds i bought this handset from sho[[ing.indiatimes for rs10994 and belive me its a coolest premium handset i have ever seen not wasting your time i would review it on yhe basis of one week use of mynprosn1)the handset looks are sao cool it resembles me of sony experia C there is matte finish on back and so the handset is nice to hold and not too slipperyn2)the battery backup is very good i tested it and played the asphault 8 game with requiresa huge power due to graphics and hence eats more battery i played the game for 42 minutes and the battery dropped by only 12%n3)the phone is powered by mt6582 chipset i.e 1.3ghz quad core processor the benchmarks were really cool nantutu 17115nquadrant standard 5852nnenamark 2 55.4 fpsnvellamo html 1957nmetal 537nmulti touch 5 pointsn4) the box contains some extra goodies that micromax never gives the box have free flip cover OTG cable screen guard the headphones is also nice n5)the free flip cover is not of cheap quality it is with artificial leather and it further enhances the looks of devicen6)display is also very nice the viewing angles are very good the handset has HD resolutionn7)the mali 400 mp2 works like a graphics card and the graphics power is 500mhz which is very very good for a gamer and the above benchmarks is same as moto Gn8) the camera quality was not nice due to software glitch but recently means yesterday only i got two updates one was 4.7 mb and another was 11.87 mb and that improved the camera quality of the phone and now the images clicked are crytal clear and in the night the flash too works pretty cooln9) xolo is the only brand who always listens to customers and provide regular updates as of now the camera quality was not nice and quickly xolo provided a update for thatnnconsn1) i dont thinks for me there was a con because in all aspects the phone was superb ans was very nice no need of any consnnnnthe people who thinks of non removable battery should throw the thought out of their mind because if phone hangs till now i didnt face any problems but if it hangs you should press the power button for 12 sec and the phone will restartnni tried to be very clear in my review and i am in love with this handset due to its looks......!!!!!!!!
RAM | 1 GB |
Processor | MediaTek MT6582 |
Rear Camera | 8 MP |
Front Camera | 2 MP |
Battery | 2250 mAh |
Display | 5.0 inches (12.7 cm) |
Launch Date | February 10, 2014 (Official) |
Operating System | Android v4.2 (Jelly Bean) |
Chipset | MediaTek MT6582 |
CPU | Quad core, 1.3 GHz, Cortex A7 |
Graphics | Mali-400 MP2 |
RAM |
1 GB
Good
|
Display Type | IPS LCD |
Screen Size | 5.0 inches (12.7 cm) |
Resolution | 1280x720 px (FULL HD) |
Pixel Density |
294 ppi
Very Good
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated) | 66.61 % |
Touch Screen | Yes, Capacitive Touchscreen, Multi-touch |
Height | 143.6 mm Compare Size |
Width | 72 mm |
Thickness |
8.3 mm
Very Good
|
Colours | Black |
Main Camera | ||
Camera Setup | Single | |
Resolution |
8 MP, Primary Camera |
|
Sensor | Back-illuminated sensor (BSI) | |
Autofocus | Yes | |
Flash | Yes, LED Flash | |
Image Resolution | 3264 x 2448 Pixels | |
Shooting Modes | High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) | |
Camera Features |
Digital Zoom Face detection Touch to focus |
|
Video Recording | 1920x1080 @ 30 fps | |
Front Camera | ||
Camera Setup | Single | |
Resolution |
2 MP, Primary Camera |
Capacity | 2250 mAh |
Type | Li-Polymer |
TalkTime | Up to 9 Hours(3G) / Up to 19 Hours(2G) |
Standby time | Up to 685 Hours(3G) / Up to 732 Hours(2G) |
Internal Memory |
4 GB
Below Average
|
Expandable Memory | Yes, Up to 32 GB |
USB OTG | Yes |
SIM Slot(s) | Dual SIM, GSM+GSM |
Network Support | 5G Not Supported in India, 3G, 2G |
SIM 1 |
3G Bands: UMTS 2100 / 900 MHz 2G Bands: GSM 1800 / 1900 / 850 / 900 MHz 3G Speed: HSDPA 21 Mbit/s ↓, HSUPA 5.76 Mbit/s ↑ GPRS: Available EDGE: Available
|
SIM 2 |
2G Bands: GSM 1800 / 1900 / 850 / 900 MHz
|
Wi-Fi | Yes, Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n) |
Bluetooth | Yes, v4.0 |
GPS | Yes with A-GPS |
USB Connectivity | microUSB 2.0 |
FM Radio | Yes |
Loudspeaker | Yes |
Audio Jack | 3.5 mm |
Other Sensors | Light sensor, Proximity sensor, Accelerometer |
Smaller screen :
4.00 inches (10.16 cm) vs 5.00 inches (12.7 cm)
Slower processor:
Quad core 1.2 GHz vs Quad core 1.3 GHz
Lower primary camera resolution:
5 MP vs 8 MP
Larger screen:
5.30 inches (13.46 cm) vs 5.00 inches (12.7 cm)
Higher primary camera resolution:
12 MP vs 8 MP
Lower battery capacity:
2100 mAH vs 2250 mAH
More internal memory:
8 GB vs 4 GB
Common Features
Smaller screen :
2.00 inches (5.08 cm) vs 5.00 inches (12.7 cm)
Lower primary camera resolution:
0.3 MP vs 8 MP
Common Features
Faster processor:
Quad core 1.4 GHz vs Quad core 1.3 GHz
More internal memory:
8 GB vs 4 GB
Lower battery capacity:
2000 mAH vs 2250 mAH
Common Features
Higher secondary camera resolution:
5 MP vs 2 MP
Smaller screen :
4.50 inches (11.43 cm) vs 5.00 inches (12.7 cm)
Slower processor:
Quad core 1.2 GHz vs Quad core 1.3 GHz
Rs 25,990