INFO

SPECS

PHOTOS

COMPETITORS

Maxx MX52e Play

+ Compare

View All Photos (4)

₹1,396 (Last Known Price)

Maxx MX52e Play is permanently discontinued.

Key Specs

Display

2.4 inches (6.1 cm); TFT
240x320 px

Rear Camera

Single Camera Setup
- 1.3 MP Primary Camera

Battery

1000 mAh

General

5G Not Supported

Add To Compare See Full Specs

Competitors For Maxx MX52e Play

View Alternatives

Lava Iris 406q

Discontinued ₹5,299

This Competitor Has

Higher Rear Camera Resolution: 5 MP vs 1 MP

Larger Screen: 4" (10.16 cm) vs 2.4" (6.1 cm)

Higher Battery Capacity: 1700 mAH vs 1000 mAH

Maxx MX52e Play VS Lava Iris 406q

Micromax X256

Discontinued

This Competitor Has

Larger Screen: 2.6" (6.6 cm) vs 2.4" (6.1 cm)

Better Display: LCD vs TFT

Lower Rear Camera Resolution: 0 MP vs 1 MP

Maxx MX52e Play VS Micromax X256

Lava ARC 9i

Discontinued ₹1,599

This Competitor Has

Better Display: LCD vs TFT

Maxx MX52e Play VS Lava ARC 9i

Fly MC202

Discontinued

This Competitor Has

Better Display: LCD vs TFT

Higher Battery Capacity: 1800 mAH vs 1000 mAH

Lower Weight: 55.8 grams vs 84.4 grams

Maxx MX52e Play VS Fly MC202

Lava KKT 15

Discontinued ₹2,899

This Competitor Has

Better Display: LCD vs TFT

Higher Battery Capacity: 1800 mAH vs 1000 mAH

Lower Rear Camera Resolution: 0 MP vs 1 MP

Maxx MX52e Play VS Lava KKT 15

Karbonn K27 Pulse

Discontinued ₹1,210

This Competitor Has

Better Display: LCD vs TFT

Higher Battery Capacity: 1700 mAH vs 1000 mAH

Lower Rear Camera Resolution: 0 MP vs 1 MP

Maxx MX52e Play VS Karbonn K27 Pulse

Maxx MX421 Supremo

Discontinued ₹1,951

This Competitor Has

Higher Rear Camera Resolution: 2 MP vs 1 MP

Larger Screen: 2.8" (7.11 cm) vs 2.4" (6.1 cm)

Higher Battery Capacity: 2100 mAH vs 1000 mAH

Maxx MX52e Play VS Maxx MX421 Supremo

Josh JM500

Discontinued

This Competitor Has

Better Display: LCD vs TFT

Higher Battery Capacity: 1800 mAH vs 1000 mAH

Smaller Screen: 2.2" (5.59 cm) vs 2.4" (6.1 cm)

Maxx MX52e Play VS Josh JM500

Micromax X101

Discontinued ₹977

This Competitor Has

Lower Rear Camera Resolution: 0 MP vs 1 MP

Smaller Screen: 1.8" (4.57 cm) vs 2.4" (6.1 cm)

Maxx MX52e Play VS Micromax X101

Intex IN 2030E V.Do Rock

Discontinued ₹3,995

This Competitor Has

Better Display: LCD vs TFT

Smaller Screen: 1.8" (4.57 cm) vs 2.4" (6.1 cm)

Higher Weight: 85 grams vs 84.4 grams

Maxx MX52e Play VS Intex IN 2030E V.Do Rock

Maxx MX52e Play Specifications

Display Design Rear Camera Battery Storage Network & Connectivity Multimedia Sensors

Display
Display Type	TFT
Screen Size	2.4 inches (6.1 cm)
Resolution	240x320 px
Pixel Density	167 ppi
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)	30.89 %
Display Colour	262k

Design
Height	118.38 mm
Width	48.81 mm
Thickness	13.21 mm
Weight	84.4 grams

Rear Camera

Resolution

Camera	MP
Primary	1.3 MP

Flash

Yes

Image Resolution

1280 x 1024 Pixels

Camera Features

Digital Zoom

Battery
Capacity	1000 mAh
Battery Type	Li-ion
TalkTime	Up to 3 Hours(2G)

Storage
Expandable Storage	Yes, Up to 8 GB

Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)	Dual SIM
Network Support	5G Not Supported
Bluetooth	Yes

Multimedia
Video Player	Yes, Video Formats: 3GP, AVI, MPEG4
Ring Tone	Music ringtones, Vibration
Music	Yes, Music Formats: AMR, MIDI, MP3, WAV
Special Features	Multi Languages, Auto Call Recording

Sensors
Games	Yes, , Sokoban, Liden, Bubble, Tetris
Java	No
Browser	Yes, WAP
Phone Book	Yes, 500 Entries, Limited
SMS	Yes, SMS Storage 200, SMS on Call Reject
MMS	Yes
Instant Messaging	Yes, Skype, Windows Live / MSN
Other Facilities	Alarm, Calender, Calculator, World clock, e Book, Timer, Speed dial, Auto redial

            Maxx MX52e Play Key Highlights
            
                  Display
                  2.4", 240 x 320 Resolution
               
                  Rear Camera
                  1.3 MP
               
                  Battery
                  1000 mAh