1. Trusted Brand
2. Micromax is one of India's largest and most popular brands for smartphones as well as other electronics devices. It is famous for providing good value-for-money devices in the budget and mid-range segments.
3. Micromax has service centres in almost all the cities in India. You can locate the nearest Micromax service Centre through SMS. Type ASC < space > City Pin code Send this SMS to 9212230707
Official Website
|
|
|
|
Bought this phone today. After 5-6 hours of testing, here are a few cons and pros that I could find-nnnPROSn1. Excellent screen, vivid display. n2. Processor is very fast(1.2 GHz Quad-Core). Games like Temple Run 2, Subway Surfer, Jetpack Joyride load in about 2 seconds. Asphalt takes about 4 seconds.n3. A little notification light on the phone tells you if you have missed a call. While charging the light is red and changes to green once the phone is charged. So, no need to check the phone again and again while charging.n4. A great multi-tasker. The phone is able to handle many heavy apps at the same time.n5. Wi-Fi tethering works great.n6. Touch is very sensitive.n7. The front and back camera click excellent pictures. The picture quality is not as good as an 8 MP camera of an Apple or Samsung phone(But, then again look at the price). The dual LED flash acts like the icing on the cake.nnCONSn1. Battery life is average. Just like all other smartphones, you need to charge it at least once a day.n2. Speakers are on the back and volume is a little on the downside. If you are in a market or a noisy place, you are likely to miss some of your calls.n3. The screen is prone to scratches.n4. The charger is the one in which the USB cable gets attached. The length of the USB cable is small.nnI got it in an outlet for 11,500 INR.nAll in all, it's a great phone at this price point with some minor glitches that can be ignored. I highly recommend it.
Sir, while buying a phone, no one considers so much the ill effects of falling from your hands.nSince if that would have been the criteria, then every cell phone company would have incorporated falling tests.nYes we do need sturdy\solid phone, which A110q is actually.nnI agree that in old days Nokia's phones have been rock solid. nnI also agree that Micromax's after sales service is still not at par with Nokia and Samsung, but would still say that they are improving, and lets hope that the way this company is growing, it returns back to the society, at least some portion of of huge profits which it has earning since last few years, and still earning!!nnBut hey you broke your phone yourself, it wasn't a manufacturing defect or system malfunction, so can't blame Micromax that much for any delays.nnHaving said that I myself own Micromax A110 Canvas2, since last 10 months, which has fallen dozen times, but the phone is rock solid, and doesn't even have a scratch and works perfect still. Thanks to screen guard and phone cover. (yes I have a small screen protector on the camera as well), And as you know there are no standard covers for camera, so I asked the person on the mobile shop if he can draft something for this phone's camera and so he did.nnIt seems you are bit unlucky that its camera glass got damaged upon falling, but this is the first and only time that I have heard someone complaining about the camera being bulged out.nnI do agree that the bulged camera seems bit odd at first, but from my personal experience of using( and falling ) this phone, this haven't troubled me at all. nAnd hence this should not hinder enthusiasts from buying such an amazing piece of technology at such worthy price :)nAll in all, Micromax has exceeded my expectations so far!
RAM | 1 GB |
Processor | MediaTek MT6589 |
Rear Camera | 8 MP |
Front Camera | 2 MP |
Battery | 2000 mAh |
Display | 5 inches (12.7 cm) |
Operating System | Android v4.2.1 (Jelly Bean) |
Chipset | MediaTek MT6589 |
CPU | Quad core, 1.2 GHz, Cortex A7 |
Graphics | PowerVR SGX 544 |
RAM |
1 GB
Good
|
Display Type | IPS LCD |
Screen Size | 5 inches (12.7 cm) |
Resolution | 480x854 px |
Pixel Density |
196 ppi
Poor
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated) | 61.14 % |
Touch Screen | Yes, Capacitive Touchscreen, Multi-touch |
Height | 147 mm Compare Size |
Width | 76.5 mm |
Thickness |
9.7 mm
Average
|
Weight |
164 grams
Good
|
Colours | Black, White |
Main Camera | ||
Camera Setup | Single | |
Resolution |
8 MP, Primary Camera |
|
Autofocus | Yes | |
Flash | Yes, Dual LED Flash | |
Image Resolution | 3264 x 2448 Pixels | |
Camera Features |
Digital Zoom Face detection Touch to focus |
|
Video Recording | 1280x720 @ 30 fps | |
Front Camera | ||
Camera Setup | Single | |
Resolution |
2 MP, Primary Camera |
Capacity | 2000 mAh |
Type | Li-ion |
Removable | Yes |
TalkTime | Up to 6 Hours(2G) |
Standby time | Up to 280 Hours(2G) |
Internal Memory |
4 GB
Below Average
|
Expandable Memory | Yes, Up to 32 GB |
User Available Storage | Up to 1.4 GB |
USB OTG | Yes |
SIM Slot(s) | Dual SIM, GSM+GSM |
SIM Size | SIM1: Mini |
Network Support | 5G Not Supported in India, 3G, 2G |
SIM 1 |
3G Bands: UMTS 2100 MHz 2G Bands: GSM 1800 / 1900 / 900 MHz 3G Speed: HSDPA 21 Mbit/s ↓, HSUPA 5.76 Mbit/s ↑ GPRS: Available EDGE: Available
|
SIM 2 |
2G Bands: GSM 1800 / 1900 / 900 MHz
|
SAR Value | Head: 0.34 W/kg, Body: 0.39 W/kg |
Wi-Fi | Yes, Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n) |
Wi-Fi Features | Mobile Hotspot |
Bluetooth | Yes, v4.0 |
GPS | Yes with A-GPS |
NFC | No |
USB Connectivity | microUSB 2.0 |
FM Radio | Yes |
Loudspeaker | Yes |
Audio Jack | 3.5 mm |
Fingerprint Sensor | No |
Other Sensors | Light sensor, Proximity sensor, Accelerometer, Compass |
Higher pixel density:
233 ppi vs 196 ppi
Smaller screen :
4.00 inches (10.16 cm) vs 5.00 inches (12.7 cm)
Lower primary camera resolution:
5 MP vs 8 MP
More RAM:
512 MB vs 1 GB
Lower secondary camera resolution:
0.3 MP vs 2 MP
Common Features
Higher pixel density:
294 ppi vs 196 ppi
Lesser weight:
156 grams vs 164 grams
More thickness:
10.7 mm vs 9.7 mm
Common Features
Larger screen:
5.30 inches (13.46 cm) vs 5.00 inches (12.7 cm)
More RAM:
512 MB vs 1 GB
Higher battery capacity:
2100 mAH vs 2000 mAH
Faster processor:
Quad core 1.3 GHz vs Quad core 1.2 GHz
Higher pixel density:
220 ppi vs 196 ppi
Lesser weight:
147 grams vs 164 grams
Common Features
More RAM:
512 MB vs 1 GB
Slower processor:
Dual core 1.0 GHz vs Quad core 1.2 GHz
Lower secondary camera resolution:
0.3 MP vs 2 MP
Rs 25,990