INFO

SPECS

PHOTOS

COMPETITORS

Micromax C250

+ Compare

View All Photos (4)

Micromax C250 is permanently discontinued.

Key Specs

Display

2 inches (5.08 cm); LCD
240x320 px

Rear Camera

Single Camera Setup
- 0.3 MP Primary Camera

Battery

820 mAh

General

5G Not Supported

Add To Compare See Full Specs

Competitors For Micromax C250

View Alternatives

Lava Iris 406q

Discontinued ₹5,299

This Competitor Has

Higher Rear Camera Resolution: 5 MP vs 0 MP

Larger Screen: 4" (10.16 cm) vs 2" (5.08 cm)

Higher Battery Capacity: 1700 mAH vs 820 mAH

Micromax C250 VS Lava Iris 406q

Samsung Guru Muzik SCH-B519

Discontinued ₹3,000

This Competitor Has

Higher Battery Capacity: 1000 mAH vs 820 mAH

Lower Weight: 78 grams vs 81 grams

Micromax C250 VS Samsung Guru Muzik SCH-B519

Celkon C205

Discontinued

This Competitor Has

Higher Rear Camera Resolution: 1 MP vs 0 MP

Higher Battery Capacity: 1000 mAH vs 820 mAH

Smaller Screen: 1.8" (4.57 cm) vs 2" (5.08 cm)

Micromax C250 VS Celkon C205

Fly C250

Discontinued

This Competitor Has

Higher Rear Camera Resolution: 2 MP vs 0 MP

Higher Battery Capacity: 1000 mAH vs 820 mAH

Higher Weight: 85 grams vs 81 grams

Micromax C250 VS Fly C250

O-Nine GC8

Discontinued

This Competitor Has

Larger Screen: 2.2" (5.59 cm) vs 2" (5.08 cm)

Higher Battery Capacity: 1800 mAH vs 820 mAH

Micromax C250 VS O-Nine GC8

Fly C-250 X-Life

Discontinued

This Competitor Has

Higher Rear Camera Resolution: 2 MP vs 0 MP

Higher Weight: 85 grams vs 81 grams

Micromax C250 VS Fly C-250 X-Life

Coolpad 2618

Discontinued

This Competitor Has

Higher Rear Camera Resolution: 1 MP vs 0 MP

Larger Screen: 2.2" (5.59 cm) vs 2" (5.08 cm)

Higher Battery Capacity: 1500 mAH vs 820 mAH

Micromax C250 VS Coolpad 2618

Samsung SPH-M520

Discontinued

This Competitor Has

Higher Rear Camera Resolution: 1 MP vs 0 MP

Lower Weight: 78 grams vs 81 grams

Lower Battery Capacity: 800 mAH vs 820 mAH

Micromax C250 VS Samsung SPH-M520

Nokia X2

Out of Stock ₹5,359

This Competitor Has

Higher Rear Camera Resolution: 5 MP vs 0 MP

Larger Screen: 4.3" (10.92 cm) vs 2" (5.08 cm)

Better Display: IPS LCD vs LCD

Micromax C250 VS Nokia X2

Celkon C369

Discontinued

This Competitor Has

Higher Rear Camera Resolution: 1 MP vs 0 MP

Larger Screen: 2.2" (5.59 cm) vs 2" (5.08 cm)

Micromax C250 VS Celkon C369

Micromax C250 Specifications

Display Design Rear Camera Battery Storage Network & Connectivity Multimedia Sensors

Display
Display Type	LCD
Screen Size	2 inches (5.08 cm)
Resolution	240x320 px
Pixel Density	200 ppi
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)	25.27 %

Design
Height	110 mm
Width	44.6 mm
Thickness	14.05 mm
Weight	81 grams

Rear Camera

Resolution

Camera	MP
Primary	0.3 MP

Flash

Yes

Shooting Modes

Continuous Shooting

Camera Features

Digital Zoom
Smile detection

Battery
Capacity	820 mAh
Battery Type	Li-ion
TalkTime	Up to 4(2G)

Storage
Expandable Storage	Yes, Up to 2 GB

Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)	Single SIM
Network Support	5G Not Supported
Wi-Fi	No
Bluetooth	No

Multimedia
Music	Yes, Music Formats: Yes, Multi Format Music Player

Sensors
Java	No
Browser	Yes
Phone Book	Yes, 1000 Entries
SMS	Yes, SMS Storage 500
MMS	Yes

            Micromax C250 Key Highlights
            
                  Display
                  2", 240 x 320 Resolution
               
                  Rear Camera
                  0.3 MP
               
                  Battery
                  820 mAh