INFO

SPECS

PHOTOS

COMPETITORS

Micromax W900

+ Compare

View All Photos (4)

Micromax W900 is permanently discontinued.

Key Specs

Windows Mobile

Performance

460 MHz
128 MB RAM

Display

3.2 inches (8.13 cm)
240x400 px

Rear Camera

Single Camera Setup
- 2 MP Primary Camera
Flash, LED Flash

Battery

1500 mAh

General

5G Not Supported
256 MB internal storage, Expandable upto 16 GB

Add To Compare See Full Specs

Competitors For Micromax W900

View Alternatives

Asus P320

Discontinued

This Competitor Has

Lower Weight: 105 grams vs 113 grams

Lower RAM: 64 MB vs 128 MB

Lower Internal Memory: 128 MB vs 256 MB

Micromax W900 VS Asus P320

Asus P565

Discontinued

This Competitor Has

Higher Rear Camera Resolution: 3.2 MP vs 2 MP

Higher Weight: 120 grams vs 113 grams

Micromax W900 VS Asus P565

Nokia 5800 XpressMusic

Discontinued ₹2,350

This Competitor Has

Higher Rear Camera Resolution: 3.2 MP vs 2 MP

Lower Weight: 109 grams vs 113 grams

Slower Processor: 434 MHz vs 460 MHz

Micromax W900 VS Nokia 5800 XpressMusic

HTC Mobiles Touch Diamond P3700 (Diamond 100)

Discontinued

This Competitor Has

Higher RAM: 192 MB vs 128 MB

Higher Rear Camera Resolution: 3.2 MP vs 2 MP

Lower Weight: 110 grams vs 113 grams

Micromax W900 VS HTC Mobiles Touch Diamond P3700 (Diamond 100)

Nokia E63

Discontinued ₹3,999

This Competitor Has

Slower Processor: 369 MHz vs 460 MHz

Smaller Screen: 2.4" (6.10 cm) vs 3.2" (8.13 cm)

Lower Internal Memory: 120 MB vs 256 MB

Micromax W900 VS Nokia E63

Panasonic X700

Discontinued

This Competitor Has

Lower Weight: 107 grams vs 113 grams

Lower Rear Camera Resolution: 0.3 MP vs 2 MP

Lower Internal Memory: 8 MB vs 256 MB

Micromax W900 VS Panasonic X700

Lava A10

Out of Stock ₹5,499

This Competitor Has

Higher Rear Camera Resolution: 3.2 MP vs 2 MP

Smaller Screen: 3" (7.62 cm) vs 3.2" (8.13 cm)

Lower Battery Capacity: 1400 mAH vs 1500 mAH

Micromax W900 VS Lava A10

Nokia Lumia 510

Out of Stock ₹10,999

This Competitor Has

Faster Processor: 800 MHz vs 460 MHz

Higher RAM: 256 MB vs 128 MB

Higher Rear Camera Resolution: 5 MP vs 2 MP

Micromax W900 VS Nokia Lumia 510

Nokia Lumia 520

Out of Stock ₹7,800

This Competitor Has

Faster Processor: 1.0 MHz vs 460 GHz

Higher RAM: 512 MB vs 128 MB

Higher Rear Camera Resolution: 5 MP vs 2 MP

Micromax W900 VS Nokia Lumia 520

Popular Comparisons

Micromax W900

Philips Xenium 9@9r

Micromax W900 Specifications

General Performance Display Design Rear Camera Battery Storage Network & Connectivity Multimedia Sensors

General
Operating System	Windows Mobile

Performance
Processor	460 MHz
RAM	128 MB

Featured

Display
Screen Size	3.2 inches (8.13 cm)
Resolution	240x400 px
Pixel Density	146 ppi
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)	47.27 %

Design
Height	112 mm
Width	55 mm
Thickness	14.20 mm
Weight	113 grams

Rear Camera

Resolution

Camera	MP
Primary	2 MP

Flash

Yes, Flash, LED Flash

Camera Features

Digital Zoom
Smile detection

Battery
Capacity	1500 mAh
Battery Type	Li-ion
TalkTime	Up to 5(2G)

Storage
Internal Storage	256 MB
Expandable Storage	Yes, Up to 16 GB

Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)	Single SIM
Network Support	5G Not Supported
Wi-Fi	Yes, Wi-Fi 3 (802.11 b/g)
Bluetooth	Yes
GPS	Yes

Multimedia
Audio Jack	3.5 mm

Sensors
Other Sensors	Accelerometer

Micromax W900 User Reviews

4.4/5

Based on 7 ratings

            Micromax W900 Key Highlights
            
                  RAM & Storage
                  128 MB + 256 MB
               
                  Display
                  3.2", 240 x 400 Resolution
               
                  Rear Camera
                  2 MP
               
                  Battery
                  1500 mAh