INFO

SPECS

PHOTOS

Micromax X290 Plus

+ Compare

View All Photos (4)

Micromax X290 Plus is permanently discontinued.

Key Specs

Display

2.4 inches (6.1 cm); LCD
240x320 px

Rear Camera

Single Camera Setup
- 1.3 MP Primary Camera

Battery

850 mAh

General

5G Not Supported

Add To Compare See Full Specs

Competitors For Micromax X290 Plus

Micromax X268

Discontinued

This Competitor Has

Higher Battery Capacity: 1000 mAH vs 850 mAH

Lower Weight: 85 grams vs 86 grams

Lower Rear Camera Resolution: 0 MP vs 1 MP

Micromax X290 Plus VS Micromax X268

Lava Iris 406q

Discontinued ₹5,299

This Competitor Has

Higher Rear Camera Resolution: 5 MP vs 1 MP

Larger Screen: 4" (10.16 cm) vs 2.4" (6.1 cm)

Higher Battery Capacity: 1700 mAH vs 850 mAH

Micromax X290 Plus VS Lava Iris 406q

Haier C5000

Discontinued

This Competitor Has

Lower Weight: 80 grams vs 86 grams

Smaller Screen: 1.5" (3.81 cm) vs 2.4" (6.1 cm)

Lower Battery Capacity: 800 mAH vs 850 mAH

Micromax X290 Plus VS Haier C5000

JXD Mobile Bold BlueBerry

Discontinued

This Competitor Has

Lower Rear Camera Resolution: 0 MP vs 1 MP

Micromax X290 Plus VS JXD Mobile Bold BlueBerry

Micromax X1i

Discontinued ₹775

This Competitor Has

Higher Battery Capacity: 1800 mAH vs 850 mAH

Lower Weight: 78 grams vs 86 grams

Smaller Screen: 1.44" (3.66 cm) vs 2.4" (6.1 cm)

Micromax X290 Plus VS Micromax X1i

Samsung Galaxy Ace Plus

Discontinued ₹4,500

This Competitor Has

Higher Rear Camera Resolution: 5 MP vs 1 MP

Larger Screen: 3.6" (9.14 cm) vs 2.4" (6.1 cm)

Higher Battery Capacity: 1300 mAH vs 850 mAH

Micromax X290 Plus VS Samsung Galaxy Ace Plus

Samsung Galaxy Ace

Discontinued ₹9,200

This Competitor Has

Higher Rear Camera Resolution: 5 MP vs 1 MP

Larger Screen: 3.5" (8.89 cm) vs 2.4" (6.1 cm)

Higher Battery Capacity: 1350 mAH vs 850 mAH

Micromax X290 Plus VS Samsung Galaxy Ace

Intex Yuva

Discontinued ₹3,075

This Competitor Has

Larger Screen: 2.6" (6.6 cm) vs 2.4" (6.1 cm)

Higher Battery Capacity: 2100 mAH vs 850 mAH

Higher Weight: 102 grams vs 86 grams

Micromax X290 Plus VS Intex Yuva

Samsung Duos Touch SCH-W299

Discontinued

This Competitor Has

Higher Rear Camera Resolution: 2 MP vs 1 MP

Higher Battery Capacity: 1140 mAH vs 850 mAH

Smaller Screen: 2.2" (5.59 cm) vs 2.4" (6.1 cm)

Micromax X290 Plus VS Samsung Duos Touch SCH-W299

Airfone AF-30

Discontinued

This Competitor Has

Lower Weight: 80 grams vs 86 grams

Lower Rear Camera Resolution: 0 MP vs 1 MP

Smaller Screen: 1.8" (4.57 cm) vs 2.4" (6.1 cm)

Micromax X290 Plus VS Airfone AF-30

Micromax X290 Plus Specifications

Display Design Rear Camera Battery Storage Network & Connectivity Multimedia Sensors

Display
Display Type	LCD
Screen Size	2.4 inches (6.1 cm)
Resolution	240x320 px
Pixel Density	167 ppi
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)	31.71 %

Design
Height	113.5 mm
Width	49.6 mm
Thickness	14.35 mm
Weight	86 grams

Rear Camera

Resolution

Camera	MP
Primary	1.3 MP

Flash

Yes

Shooting Modes

Continuous Shooting

Camera Features

Digital Zoom
Smile detection

Battery
Capacity	850 mAh
Battery Type	Li-ion
TalkTime	Up to 4(2G)

Storage
Expandable Storage	Yes, Up to 8 GB

Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)	Dual SIM
Network Support	5G Not Supported
Wi-Fi	No
Bluetooth	No

Multimedia
Music	Yes, Music Formats: Yes, Multi Format Music Player with 3.5mm Audio Jack

Sensors
Java	No
Browser	Yes
Phone Book	Yes
SMS	Yes
MMS	N/A

            Micromax X290 Plus Key Highlights
            
                  Display
                  2.4", 240 x 320 Resolution
               
                  Rear Camera
                  1.3 MP
               
                  Battery
                  850 mAh