Mitac MIO A702
+ CompareMitac MIO A702 is permanently discontinued.
Key Specs
Windows Mobile
Performance
-
TI OMAP 850 -
200 MHz -
256 MB RAM
Display
-
2.7 inches (6.86 cm); LCD -
240x320 px
Rear Camera
-
Single Camera Setup - 3.2 MP Primary Camera
-
LED Flash
Battery
-
1130 mAh
General
-
5G Not Supported -
2 GB internal storage, Non Expandable
Add To Compare
See Full Specs
Competitors For Mitac MIO A702
View Alternatives
Discontinued
₹22,900
This Competitor Has
Faster Processor: 528.0 Mhz vs 200.0 Mhz
Larger Screen: 2.8" (7.11 cm) vs 2.7" (6.86 cm)
Lower Weight: 113 grams vs 148 grams
Lower Battery Capacity: 1100 mAH vs 1130 mAH
Lower Internal Memory: 512 GB vs 2 GB
Common Features
RAM: 256 MB
Rear Camera Resolution: 3 MP
Display Type: LCD
...show more
Mitac MIO A702
VS
HTC Tattoo
Discontinued
₹5,299
This Competitor Has
Faster Processor: 1.2 Mhz vs 200.0 Mhz
Higher RAM: 1 MB vs 256 MB
Higher Rear Camera Resolution: 5 MP vs 3 MP
Larger Screen: 4" (10.16 cm) vs 2.7" (6.86 cm)
Higher Battery Capacity: 1700 mAH vs 1130 mAH
Higher Internal Memory: 4 GB vs 2 GB
Standard Display: TFT vs LCD
...show more
Mitac MIO A702
VS
Lava Iris 406q
Discontinued
This Competitor Has
Lower Weight: 83 grams vs 148 grams
Lower Rear Camera Resolution: 0 MP vs 3 MP
Common Features
Display Type: LCD
...show more
Mitac MIO A702
VS
Bird DV10
Discontinued
This Competitor Has
Faster Processor: 312.0 Mhz vs 200.0 Mhz
Lower Weight: 90 grams vs 148 grams
Lower RAM: 32 MB vs 256 MB
Lower Rear Camera Resolution: 2 MP vs 3 MP
Smaller Screen: 2.2" (5.59 cm) vs 2.7" (6.86 cm)
Standard Display: TFT vs LCD
Lower Battery Capacity: 900 mAH vs 1130 mAH
Lower Internal Memory: 64 GB vs 2 GB
...show more
Mitac MIO A702
VS
Blackberry Pearl 8120
Discontinued
This Competitor Has
Faster Processor: 1.0 Mhz vs 200.0 Mhz
Higher RAM: 768 MB vs 256 MB
Larger Screen: 3.2" (8.13 cm) vs 2.7" (6.86 cm)
Higher Battery Capacity: 1300 mAH vs 1130 mAH
Higher Internal Memory: 4 GB vs 2 GB
Lower Weight: 112 grams vs 148 grams
Common Features
Rear Camera Resolution: 3 MP
Display Type: LCD
...show more
Mitac MIO A702
VS
Samsung Galaxy Young
Discontinued
This Competitor Has
Faster Processor: 528.0 Mhz vs 200.0 Mhz
Larger Screen: 3.2" (8.13 cm) vs 2.7" (6.86 cm)
Higher Battery Capacity: 1150 mAH vs 1130 mAH
Lower RAM: 192 MB vs 256 MB
Lower Internal Memory: 256 GB vs 2 GB
Higher Weight: 158 grams vs 148 grams
Common Features
Rear Camera Resolution: 3 MP
Display Type: LCD
...show more
Mitac MIO A702
VS
T-Mobile G1
Discontinued
This Competitor Has
Faster Processor: 624.0 Mhz vs 200.0 Mhz
Higher Battery Capacity: 1550 mAH vs 1130 mAH
Lower Weight: 122 grams vs 148 grams
Lower Rear Camera Resolution: 2 MP vs 3 MP
Smaller Screen: 2.4" (6.1 cm) vs 2.7" (6.86 cm)
Lower Internal Memory: 256 GB vs 2 GB
Common Features
RAM: 256 MB
Display Type: LCD
...show more
Mitac MIO A702
VS
Blackberry Bold 2
Discontinued
This Competitor Has
Lower Weight: 125 grams vs 148 grams
Lower Rear Camera Resolution: 1 MP vs 3 MP
Lower Internal Memory: 15 GB vs 2 GB
...show more
Mitac MIO A702
VS
Mitsubishi M430i M900
Discontinued
₹12,000
This Competitor Has
Faster Processor: 800.0 Mhz vs 200.0 Mhz
Larger Screen: 2.8" (7.11 cm) vs 2.7" (6.86 cm)
Higher Battery Capacity: 1500 mAH vs 1130 mAH
Lower Weight: 128 grams vs 148 grams
Standard Display: TFT vs LCD
Lower Internal Memory: 156 GB vs 2 GB
Common Features
RAM: 256 MB
Rear Camera Resolution: 3 MP
...show more
Mitac MIO A702
VS
LG Optimus Pro
Out of Stock
₹5,359
This Competitor Has
Faster Processor: 1.2 Mhz vs 200.0 Mhz
Higher RAM: 1 MB vs 256 MB
Higher Rear Camera Resolution: 5 MP vs 3 MP
Larger Screen: 4.3" (10.92 cm) vs 2.7" (6.86 cm)
Better Display: IPS LCD vs LCD
Higher Battery Capacity: 1800 mAH vs 1130 mAH
Higher Internal Memory: 4 GB vs 2 GB
Higher Weight: 150 grams vs 148 grams
...show more
Mitac MIO A702
VS
Nokia X2
Mitac MIO A702 Specifications
General
Performance
Display
Design
Rear Camera
Battery
Storage
Network & Connectivity
General |
|
|---|---|
| Operating System | Windows Mobile |
Performance |
|
|---|---|
| Chipset | TI OMAP 850 |
| Processor | 200 MHz, TI |
| RAM | 256 MB |
Display |
|
|---|---|
| Display Type | LCD |
| Screen Size | 2.7 inches (6.86 cm) |
| Resolution | 240x320 px |
| Pixel Density | 148 ppi |
| Screen to Body Ratio (calculated) | 35.72 % |
Design |
|
|---|---|
| Height | 110 mm |
| Width | 57.5 mm |
| Thickness | 16.50 mm |
| Weight | 148 grams |
Rear Camera |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Resolution | ||||
|
||||
| Autofocus | Yes | |||
| Flash | Yes, LED Flash | |||
| Camera Features | Digital Zoom |
Battery |
|
|---|---|
| Capacity | 1130 mAh |
| Battery Type | Li-ion |
| TalkTime | Up to 4(2G) |
Storage |
|
|---|---|
| Internal Storage | 2 GB |
| Expandable Storage | Yes |
Network & Connectivity |
|
|---|---|
| SIM Slot(s) | Single SIM |
| Network Support | 5G Not Supported |
| Wi-Fi | Yes, Wi-Fi 3 (802.11 a/b/g) |
| Bluetooth | Yes, v2 |
| GPS | Yes |
Mitac MIO A702 Key Highlights
| Processor | TI OMAP 850 |
| RAM & Storage | 256 MB + 2 GB |
| Display | 2.7", 240 x 320 Resolution |
| Rear Camera | 3.2 MP |
| Battery | 1130 mAh |
Popular Mobiles
Popular Links
- All Upcoming Phones
Latest Launches
- vivo X300 FE
- OnePlus Nord CE 6 Lite 5G
- OPPO Find X9 Ultra
- vivo X300 Ultra
- realme 16T 5G
By Price
- Best Phones Under 10,000
- Best Phones Under 15,000
- Best Phones Under 20,000
- Best phones in any price range
Phones By Top Brands
- Samsung Mobiles
- Moto Mobiles
- vivo Mobiles
- OPPO Mobiles
- Tecno Mobiles
- OnePlus Mobiles
- realme Mobiles
