|
Add to Compare
|
×
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Samsung Exynos 2500 vs Samsung Exynos 2200
Share
Based on benchmark performance, Samsung Exynos 2500 achieves a higher total AnTuTu score of 1,515,751 (tested by 91Mobiles), compared to Samsung Exynos 2200's 1,073,002 (tested by 91Mobiles), making Samsung Exynos 2500 the more powerful processor.
... read more|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Release Date
|
Jun, 2025
|
Jan, 2022
|
CPU
|
Deca Core
(3.3 GHz, Single Core + 2.74 GHz, Dual core + 2.36 GHz, Penta Core + 1.8 GHz, Dual core)
|
Octa core
(2.8 GHz, Single Core + 2.52 GHz, Tri core + 1.82 GHz, Quad core)
|
Process Node
|
3 nm
|
4 nm
|
GPU
|
Xclipse 950
|
Xclipse 920
|
Memory Type
|
LPDDR5X
|
LPDDR5
|
AnTuTu Score
|
1,515,751
|
1,073,002
|
Geekbench Score
|
2,064/7,609
|
1,573/3,873
|
Phones Powered by These SoCs
Benchmark
AnTuTu
(The higher, the better)
AnTuTu measures CPU, GPU, memory and overall performance in different scenarios
Samsung Exynos 2500
1,515,751
Samsung Exynos 2200
1,073,002
CPU
379,701
315,906
GPU
529,745
373,247
Memory
360,939
164,351
UX
245,366
219,498
Geekbench
(The higher, the better)
The Geekbench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Geekbench Single Core
Samsung Exynos 2500
2,064
Samsung Exynos 2200
1,573
Geekbench Multi Core
Samsung Exynos 2500
7,609
Samsung Exynos 2200
3,873
Benchmark Screenshots
AnTuTu Score:
General
SoC Brand
|
Samsung
|
Samsung
|
Title
|
Samsung Exynos 2500
|
Samsung Exynos 2200
|
Model No
|
S5E9955
|
S5E9925
|
Manufacturing
|
Samsung
|
Samsung
|
CPU
Total Cores
|
Deca Core
|
Octa core
|
CPU
|
Deca Core (3.3 GHz, Single Core, Cortex X925 + 2.74 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A725 + 2.36 GHz, Penta Core, Cortex A725 + 1.8 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A520)
|
Octa core (2.8 GHz, Single Core, Cortex X2 + 2.52 GHz, Tri core, Cortex A710 + 1.82 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A510)
|
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Process Node
|
3 nm
|
4 nm
|
Instruction Set
|
ARMv9.2-A
|
ARMv9-A
|
L1 Cache
|
128 KB
|
N/A
|
L2 Cache
|
3 MB
|
N/A
|
L3 Cache
|
16 MB
|
4 MB
|
GPU
GPU
|
Xclipse 950
|
Xclipse 920
|
GPU Clock speed
|
999 MHz
|
1.306 GHz
|
Pipelines
|
8
|
3
|
Shading Units
|
128
|
128
|
Total Shaders
|
1024
|
384
|
FLOPS
|
4091.9 Gigaflops
|
1003 Gigaflops
|
Vulkan Version
|
1.4
|
1.3
|
OpenCL Version
|
3.0 FP
|
2.0 FP
|
DirectX Version
|
12.1
|
12.1
|
Memory
Memory Type
|
LPDDR5X
|
LPDDR5
|
Memory Speed
|
4.8 GHz
|
3.2 GHz
|
Bus
|
4x16 Bit
|
4x16 Bit
|
Memory Max bandwidth
|
76.8 Gb/s
|
51.2 Gb/s
|
Memory Max size
|
24 GB
|
24 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 4.0
|
UFS 3.1
|
Camera
Max Camera Sensor Supported
|
320 MP
|
200 MP
|
Max Video Capture Resolution
|
8K @ 30 FPS
|
8K @ 30 FPS
|
Display
Max On-Device Display Resolution
|
UHD
|
UHD @ 120 Hz
|
Max Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz
|
144 Hz
|
Multimedia
Video Playback Resolution
|
8K @ 60 FPS
|
8K @ 60 FPS
|
Video Codecs
|
H.264 (AVC), H.265 (HEVC), AV1, VP9
|
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
|
Audio Codecs
|
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
|
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
|
Connectivity
Modem Name
|
Exynos 5400
|
Exynos 5300
|
5G Support
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Peak Download Speed
|
Up to 12100 Mbps
|
Up to 7350 Mbps
|
Peak Upload Speed
|
Up to 3670 Mbps
|
Up to 3670 Mbps
|
Wi-Fi Version
|
7
|
6
|
Wi-Fi Standard
|
ac, ax, b, be, g, n, n 5GHz
|
a, ac, ax, b, g, n, n 5GHz
|
Bluetooth Version
|
5.4
|
5.2
|
Navigation
|
BeiDou, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, NavIC, QZSS
|
BeiDou, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, NavIC
|
User Feedback
Related Comparisons
Samsung Exynos 2500
Apple A18 Pro
Samsung Exynos 2500
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
Samsung Exynos 2500
Google Tensor G5
Samsung Exynos 2500
Apple A17 Pro
Samsung Exynos 2500
Google Tensor G4
Samsung Exynos 2200
Apple A16 Bionic
Samsung Exynos 2200
Apple A15 Bionic
Samsung Exynos 2200
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
Samsung Exynos 2200
MediaTek Dimensity 9200
Samsung Exynos 2200
Google Tensor G3