Motorola ATRIX TV XT682 vs Samsung Galaxy S3 mini

Comparing the Motorola ATRIX TV XT682 vs Samsung Galaxy S3 mini across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Performance: Both Motorola ATRIX TV XT682 and Samsung Galaxy S3 mini run at the same processing speed of 1.0 GHz.

Display: Both Motorola ATRIX TV XT682 and Samsung Galaxy S3 mini offer the same screen size of 4 inches, but Samsung Galaxy S3 mini features a Super AMOLED display compared to Motorola ATRIX TV XT682's TFT, making Samsung Galaxy S3 mini the better display of the two.

Rear Camera: Motorola ATRIX TV XT682 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 8 MP, while Samsung Galaxy S3 mini offers 5 MP, making Motorola ATRIX TV XT682 better for rear camera photography.

Front Camera: Both Motorola ATRIX TV XT682 and Samsung Galaxy S3 mini feature a 0.3 MP primary front camera.

Battery: Motorola ATRIX TV XT682 offers a higher battery capacity with 1700 mAh, while Samsung Galaxy S3 mini offers 1500 mAh, making Motorola ATRIX TV XT682 better for longer battery life.

Storage: Samsung Galaxy S3 mini offers higher internal storage with 16 GB, while Motorola ATRIX TV XT682 offers 1 GB, making Samsung Galaxy S3 mini the better option for storage.