Panasonic Eluga Ray 800
₹6,499
(Discontinued)
|
67%
Itel A100 Pro 4G
₹8,999
(Not Released in India)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Panasonic Eluga Ray 800 vs Itel A100 Pro 4G
Comparing the Panasonic Eluga Ray 800 vs Itel A100 Pro 4G across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Itel A100 Pro 4G runs at a higher processing speed of 1.82 GHz, while Panasonic Eluga Ray 800 runs at 1.8 GHz, making Itel A100 Pro 4G the better performer.
Display: Itel A100 Pro 4G offers a screen size of 6.56 inches, while Panasonic Eluga Ray 800 offers 5.5 inches, making Itel A100 Pro 4G the larger display of the two. Both Panasonic Eluga Ray 800 and Itel A100 Pro 4G feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Panasonic Eluga Ray 800 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 13 MP, while Itel A100 Pro 4G offers 8 MP, making Panasonic Eluga Ray 800 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Panasonic Eluga Ray 800 offers a higher front camera resolution with 8 MP, while Itel A100 Pro 4G offers 5 MP, making Panasonic Eluga Ray 800 better for front camera photography.
Battery: Itel A100 Pro 4G offers a higher battery capacity with 5000 mAh, while Panasonic Eluga Ray 800 offers 4000 mAh, making Itel A100 Pro 4G better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both Panasonic Eluga Ray 800 and Itel A100 Pro 4G offer the same internal storage of 64 GB.
|
Panasonic Eluga Ray 800
₹6,499
(Discontinued)
|
Itel A100 Pro 4G
₹8,999
(Not Released in India)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
N/A
|
67%
|
Release Date
|
01 Mar, 2019
|
31 Aug, 2026
|
Performance
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
Unisoc T7100
|
|
Tru-Octa Core (upto 1.8 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 1.82 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
3 GB RAM
|
Display
|
N/A
|
|
|
5.5 inches (13.97 cm)
|
6.56 inches (16.66 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
1080x1920 px (FULL HD)
|
720x1520 px (HD+)
|
|
N/A
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
13 MP
Primary Camera
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
8 MP
|
5 MP
|
Battery
|
N/A
|
|
|
4000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
10W
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
N/A
|
eMMC
|
Expert Review
|
N/A
|
7.6/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
3.7/5
(4,674 ratings)
|
N/A
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
203,558
AnTuTu Score
|
|
N/A
|
9h 00m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v7.0 (Nougat)
|
Android v15
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
N/A
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
N/A
|
Unisoc T7100
|
Processor
|
Octa core, 1.8 GHz
|
Octa core
1.82 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A75 1.82 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
N/A
|
Mali-G52 MP2
|
RAM
|
4 GB
|
3 GB
|
RAM Type
|
N/A
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
N/A
|
203,558
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
33.0 s
|
Display
Display Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
5.5 inches (13.97 cm)
|
6.56 inches (16.66 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x1920 px (FULL HD)
|
720x1520 px (HD+)
|
Brightness
|
N/A
|
400 nits
|
Aspect Ratio
|
16:9
|
20:9
|
Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
90 Hz
|
Pixel Density
|
401 ppi
|
256 ppi
|
Touch Sampling Rate
|
N/A
|
180 Hz
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
72.31 %
|
N/A
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v3
|
N/A
|
Bezel-less Display
|
N/A
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Design
Height
|
152.8 mm
|
N/A
|
Width
|
75.3 mm
|
N/A
|
Thickness
|
8.6 mm
|
8.49 mm
|
Weight
|
162 grams
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
N/A
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
13 MP
Primary Cameraf/2.2CMOS image sensor |
8 MP
Primary Camera4x Digital Zoomf/2.01.12µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection autofocus
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes
|
Image Resolution
|
4128 x 3096 Pixels
|
N/A
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation
|
N/A
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
N/A
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
4 x Digital Zoom
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
N/A
|
Avg
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Primary Camera |
5 MP
Primary Camera1.12µm pixel size |
Flash
|
N/A
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
4000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
N/A
|
Quick Charging
|
N/A
|
Yes 10W
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
N/A
|
9h 00m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
3h 4m
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB
|
64 GB
|
Storage Type
|
N/A
|
eMMC
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 128 GB
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Micro SIM2: Micro
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
N/A
|
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 a/b/e/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.2
|
Yes
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
N/A
|
IR Blaster
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
USB Type-C
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
N/A
|