1. Trusted Brand
2. HTC has over 200 service locations spread over India covering most major cities. Toll Free Number: 18002663566
Official Website
|
|
|
|
Samsung Galaxy Quattro and this Phone has same Specifications yet Price is 26k! Just for design does hTC believes people should pay 11k extra plus the way hTC is doing with updates should any one even think of this? Samsung though does not boast of design like this but at least they do not forget their customers and provide good software upgrades. Please request to all to ignore this and make this company realize that they just can't sell handsets with ridiculous prices and then make them regret their purchase. Important Facts even though this company makes the best Android Handsets and has won several awards for same:n*hTC One X and One X+ are far better at this price point though their Android Update support seems really scary because of hTC habits! They have promised support but they have failed so many times!n*hTC One S was launched with inferior H/W at 30K above Price and now updates stopped at 4.1 without proper justificationn*hTC Desire SV was launched with a promise of Jelly Bean but it has never happened till now!n*Butterfly was launched at 45k and still no updates plus there are and still better handsets available with gradual price cuts!n*One X and One X+ were given extreme price cuts of around 10k all of a sudden instead of gradual reductionn*Several Dual SIM launched are on ICS like Desire U, XC, X, XDS etc in 2013n*Sony, Samsung, Nokia, LG etc all have much better and future proof handsets with sensible pricingn*hTC One a flagship is the slowest to receive 4.2.2 and its still not globally launched.nnWhat to expect from this company!
I have been observing that most of us don't own the product or used the product but we review it. Its fine if you make your comments based on facts. Many people here comparing HTC Desire 600 with Samsung Quattro. I have not used the HTC but have good hands on experience with Quattro. And believe me it's not a pleasant one. nnIf we go with the specifications then Quattro is a lower version of Galaxy Grand. Try Flipkart's compare function and you will know that. Basic difference making features of the Desire 600.nnGood quality screen (qHD with Super LCD 2). Quattro got a WVGA TFT screen. A qHD screen is always better then WVGA and when it is smaller then the WVGA, it's steel. I have used Quattro and the is screen really pathetic. nnThe processor of Quattro is 1.2 GHz Cortex A5, Quad Core but most of the functions hang if you have 02 applications running simultaneously. Grands Dual core is much better.nn Any time the HTC sense is much better then any other Skin wether it is Samsungs TouchWiz or any thing else.nnCamera is far better on HTC. BSI (Back side Illuminated) sensor is very good for low light imaging and I know that as I'm a photographer. Camera comes with dedicated image chip like most of SLRs for fast processing and saves space for RAM. Secondry camera is 1.3 MP Vs .3 MP of Quattro. nnBattery on both the phones look weak. 1860 mAH Vs 2000 mAH. anything above 2300 mAH will make differncennI'm not including Dual active sim, NFC (Near Field Connection), Boom Sound, Amplifiers as I do not want to compare what Quattro do not have.nnIndeed the HTC Desire is over priced but not as much as people say. It is over priced by say 2K to 3K. and that will come down when it will be available in the open market like Samsung's Grand which was launched at 21.5 K but now selling at 18 K.
RAM | 1 GB |
Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8625Q |
Rear Camera | 8 MP |
Front Camera | 1.6 MP |
Battery | 1860 mAh |
Display | 4.5 inches (11.43 cm) |
Operating System | Android v4.1.2 (Jelly Bean) |
Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8625Q |
CPU | Quad core, 1.2 GHz, Cortex A5 |
Architecture | 32 bit |
Graphics | Adreno 203 |
RAM |
1 GB
Good
|
Display Type | S-LCD 2 |
Screen Size | 4.5 inches (11.43 cm) |
Resolution | 540x960 px |
Pixel Density |
245 ppi
Average
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated) | 61.67 % |
Touch Screen | Yes, Capacitive Touchscreen, Multi-touch |
Height | 134.8 mm Compare Size |
Width | 67 mm |
Thickness |
9.26 mm
Average
|
Weight |
130 grams
Very Good
|
Colours | Black, White |
Main Camera | ||
Camera Setup | Single | |
Resolution | 8 MP f/2.0, Primary Camera(28 mm focal length) | |
Sensor | Back-illuminated sensor (BSI) | |
Autofocus | Yes | |
Flash | Yes, LED Flash | |
Image Resolution | 3264 x 2448 Pixels | |
Settings | ISO control | |
Shooting Modes | Continuous Shooting | |
Camera Features |
Digital Zoom Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
|
Video Recording | 1280x720 @ 30 fps | |
Front Camera | ||
Camera Setup | Single | |
Resolution |
1.6 MP, Primary Camera |
|
Sensor | BSI Sensor |
Capacity | 1860 mAh |
Type | Li-Polymer |
TalkTime | Up to 11.1 Hours(3G) / Up to 11.4 Hours(2G) |
Standby time | Up to 577 Hours(3G) / Up to 539 Hours(2G) |
Internal Memory |
8 GB
Average
|
Expandable Memory | Yes, Up to 64 GB |
SIM Slot(s) | Dual SIM, GSM+GSM |
SIM Size | SIM1: Micro, SIM2: Micro |
Network Support | 5G Not Supported in India, 3G, 2G |
SIM 1 |
3G Bands: UMTS 2100 / 900 MHz 2G Bands: GSM 1800 / 1900 / 900 MHz 3G Speed: HSDPA 7.2 Mbit/s ↓, HSUPA 5.76 Mbit/s ↑ GPRS: Available EDGE: Available
|
SIM 2 |
2G Bands: GSM 1800 / 1900 / 900 MHz
|
SAR Value | Head: 1.300 W/kg, Body: 0.479 W/kg |
Wi-Fi | Yes, Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n) |
Wi-Fi Features | Wi-Fi Direct, Mobile Hotspot |
Bluetooth | Yes, v4.0 |
GPS | Yes with A-GPS, Glonass |
NFC | Yes |
USB Connectivity | microUSB 2.0 |
FM Radio | Yes, RDS, Stereo FM |
Stereo Speakers | Yes |
Audio Jack | 3.5 mm |
Other Sensors | Light sensor, Proximity sensor, Accelerometer |
Smaller screen :
4.00 inches (10.16 cm) vs 4.50 inches (11.43 cm)
Lower primary camera resolution:
5 MP vs 8 MP
Lower battery capacity:
1700 mAH vs 1860 mAH
Larger screen:
5.00 inches (12.7 cm) vs 4.50 inches (11.43 cm)
Higher battery capacity:
2100 mAH vs 1860 mAH
Higher secondary camera resolution:
2.1 MP vs 1.6 MP
Lesser weight:
127 grams vs 130 grams
More thickness:
9.55 mm vs 9.26 mm
Common Features
More RAM:
512 MB vs 1 GB
Smaller screen :
3.50 inches (8.89 cm) vs 4.50 inches (11.43 cm)
Slower processor:
Dual core 1.0 GHz vs Quad core 1.2 GHz
Larger screen:
5.50 inches (13.97 cm) vs 4.50 inches (11.43 cm)
Faster processor:
Quad core 1.6 GHz vs Quad core 1.2 GHz
More RAM:
1.5 GB vs 1 GB
Lesser weight:
123 grams vs 130 grams
Smaller screen :
4.30 inches (10.92 cm) vs 4.50 inches (11.43 cm)
Lower battery capacity:
1800 mAH vs 1860 mAH
Rs 23,999