Motorola Q9h
+ Compare
Motorola Q9h is permanently discontinued.
Key Specs
Performance
-
96 MB RAM
Display
-
240.00x240 pixels , 2.4 inches px
Rear Camera
-
Single Camera Setup - 2 MP Primary Camera
-
LED Flash
General
-
5G Not Supported -
256 MB internal storage, Non Expandable
Add To Compare
See Full Specs
Competitors For Motorola Q9h
View Alternatives
Discontinued
₹5,299
This Competitor Has
Higher RAM: 1 MB vs 96 MB
Higher Rear Camera Resolution: 5 MP vs 2 MP
Higher Internal Memory: 4 MB vs 256 MB
...show more
Motorola Q9h
VS
Lava Iris 406q
Discontinued
This Competitor Has
Lower Weight: 130 grams vs 134 grams
Lower RAM: 64 MB vs 96 MB
Lower Rear Camera Resolution: 1 MP vs 2 MP
Common Features
...show more
Motorola Q9h
VS
Motorola Q9m
Discontinued
₹3,999
This Competitor Has
Lower Weight: 126 grams vs 134 grams
Lower Internal Memory: 120 MB vs 256 MB
Common Features
Rear Camera Resolution: 2 MP
...show more
Motorola Q9h
VS
Nokia E63
Discontinued
This Competitor Has
Higher RAM: 150 MB vs 96 MB
Lower Weight: 125 grams vs 134 grams
Common Features
Rear Camera Resolution: 2 MP
...show more
Motorola Q9h
VS
Samsung i907 Epix
Discontinued
₹10,900
This Competitor Has
Higher RAM: 128 MB vs 96 MB
Lower Weight: 106 grams vs 134 grams
Standard Display: TFT vs LCD
Common Features
...show more
Motorola Q9h
VS
Blackberry Curve 8520
Discontinued
₹6,599
This Competitor Has
Lower Weight: 114 grams vs 134 grams
Lower Internal Memory: 55 MB vs 256 MB
Common Features
Rear Camera Resolution: 2 MP
...show more
Motorola Q9h
VS
Nokia C3
Discontinued
This Competitor Has
Higher Rear Camera Resolution: 3 MP vs 2 MP
Lower Weight: 115 grams vs 134 grams
Lower RAM: 64 MB vs 96 MB
Common Features
...show more
Motorola Q9h
VS
Motorola Q 11
Discontinued
This Competitor Has
Higher Rear Camera Resolution: 3 MP vs 2 MP
Lower Weight: 85 grams vs 134 grams
Lower Internal Memory: 60 MB vs 256 MB
Common Features
...show more
Motorola Q9h
VS
Samsung D900
Discontinued
₹5,990
This Competitor Has
Higher Rear Camera Resolution: 3 MP vs 2 MP
Lower Weight: 102.2 grams vs 134 grams
Lower Internal Memory: 50 MB vs 256 MB
Common Features
...show more
Motorola Q9h
VS
Motorola Starling EX115
Discontinued
₹10,999
This Competitor Has
Higher RAM: 256 MB vs 96 MB
Higher Rear Camera Resolution: 3 MP vs 2 MP
Lower Weight: 122 grams vs 134 grams
Common Features
...show more
Motorola Q9h
VS
Blackberry Bold 9700
Motorola Q9h Specifications
Performance |
|
|---|---|
| RAM | 96 MB |
Display |
|
|---|---|
| Display Type | LCD |
| Resolution | 240.00x240 pixels , 2.4 inches px |
Design |
|
|---|---|
| Height | 118.00 mm |
| Width | 67.00 mm |
| Thickness | 11.80 mm |
| Weight | 134 grams |
Rear Camera |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Resolution | ||||
|
||||
| Flash | Yes, LED Flash | |||
| Camera Features | Digital Zoom |
Battery |
|
|---|---|
| TalkTime | Up to 6.5(2G) |
Storage |
|
|---|---|
| Internal Storage | 256 MB |
| Expandable Storage | Yes |
Network & Connectivity |
|
|---|---|
| SIM Slot(s) | Single SIM |
| Network Support | 5G Not Supported |
| Wi-Fi | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes, v2 |
Multimedia |
|
|---|---|
| Music | Yes, Music Formats: MPEG4 |
Sensors |
|
|---|---|
| Java | Yes, MIDP 2.0 |
| Browser | Yes |
Recent Stories
Nothing Phone (3) long-term review: last year's flagship looks better in 2026
by Dhruv Joshi
New Nothing OS update adds Essential Voice to Phone (4a) series and Phone (3): what it is and how it works
by Ashish Kumar
Hands-on with Nothing Essential App Builder: vibe coding apps with AI
by Dhruv Joshi
View All Stories
Motorola Q9h Key Highlights
| RAM & Storage | 96 MB + 256 MB |
| Rear Camera | 2 MP |
Popular Mobiles
Popular Links
- All Upcoming Phones
- Motorola phones under 20k
Latest Launches
- vivo X300 FE
- OnePlus Nord CE 6 Lite 5G
- OPPO Find X9 Ultra
- vivo X300 Ultra
- realme 16T 5G
By Price
- Best Phones Under 10,000
- Best Phones Under 15,000
- Best Phones Under 20,000
- Best phones in any price range
Phones By Top Brands
- Samsung Mobiles
- Moto Mobiles
- vivo Mobiles
- OPPO Mobiles
- Tecno Mobiles
- OnePlus Mobiles
- realme Mobiles