|
|
|
|
Nice working, lite weightweight and best model phone. Happy browsing and chatting
ABSURD AND TOTAL WASTE OF MONEY. PLEASE DON'T WASTE YOUR TIME AND MONEY. THE COMPANY MUST BE SUED. IN THE MOBILE MARKET AND MOBILE INDUSTRY, SUCH ABSURD PRODUCT CANNOT BE FOUND.
RAM | 128 MB |
Rear Camera | 2 MP |
Battery | 1350 mAh |
Display | 3.5 inches (8.89 cm) |
Operating System | Android v2.3.5 (Gingerbread) |
CPU | Single core, 1 GHz |
RAM | 128 MB |
Display Type | LCD |
Screen Size | 3.5 inches (8.89 cm) |
Resolution | 320x480 px |
Pixel Density | 165 ppi |
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated) | 49.88 % |
Touch Screen | Yes, Capacitive Touchscreen, Multi-touch |
Height | 115.7 mm Compare Size |
Width | 63.2 mm |
Thickness | 9.4 mm |
Weight | 95 grams |
Colours | Black, White |
Main Camera | ||
Camera Setup | Single | |
Resolution |
2 MP, Primary Camera |
|
Image Resolution | 1600 x 1200 Pixels | |
Camera Features | Digital Zoom |
Capacity | 1350 mAh |
Type | Li-ion |
Internal Memory | 256 MB |
Expandable Memory | Yes, Up to 32 GB |
SIM Slot(s) | Dual SIM, GSM+GSM |
Network Support | 5G Not Supported in India, 2G |
SIM 1 |
2G Bands: GSM 1800 / 900 MHz GPRS: Available EDGE: Available
|
SIM 2 |
2G Bands: GSM 1800 / 900 MHz
|
Wi-Fi | Yes, Wi-Fi |
Bluetooth | Yes |
USB Connectivity | microUSB 2.0 |
FM Radio | Yes |
Loudspeaker | Yes |
Audio Jack | 3.5 mm |
Larger screen:
4.00 inches (10.16 cm) vs 3.50 inches (8.89 cm)
More RAM:
256 MB vs 128 MB
Higher primary camera resolution:
3 MP vs 2 MP
Lesser expandable memory:
8 GB vs 32 GB
More thickness:
11.8 mm vs 9.4 mm
Common Features
Common Features
Lower battery capacity:
1250 mAH vs 1350 mAH
Lesser expandable memory:
4 GB vs 32 GB
More thickness:
11.8 mm vs 9.4 mm
Common Features
More RAM:
256 MB vs 128 MB
Lower battery capacity:
1200 mAH vs 1350 mAH
Lesser internal memory:
2 GB vs 256 MB
Rs 25,990