1. Trusted Brand
2. Setup in 2012, XOLO is an Indian brand which primarily deals in mid-range Android smartphones. It is owned by Lava International.
3. Xolo has over 1200 service centres in India. Toll Free Number: 180030100104
Official Website
|
|
|
|
Got the device from another online store. nHave used this device for the past 24 hours... So Far I have never encountered any problems or lags and hope it would be the same...nnPROS :n1.Exquisite display... really a treat to your Eyes...n2.Gr8 to hold and super touch response..n3.No lags so far and gr8 performance with gamesn4.Had a Benchmark score of 3946 which I am sure no phone under 10k price would give youn5.Compass works fine and light sensors are very sensitive and works finen6.Back Camera works fine and for a 5MP its hard performer and Flash works great with low lightn7.Pre-Installed Google Chrome Browsern8.Great relief to see the OS is not cooked with unwanted applications.n9.Battery is detachable unlike its predecessor X900 and battery life comes around 30 hours on hard use [Browsing, FB-ing and MP3]n10.There is Compass :-)n nCONS:n1.Apps can't be moved to SD card but internal space is 2GBn Phone internal 1GB + Phone Flas 1GBn2.Front cam is VGA and is not upto the expectations. But its negotiable for the Price and moreover i don't think Front cam is used with Indian network providersn3.No JellyBean update. But hopefully since X1000 has got an updatewe could expect the same for the product.n4.Though the device record video in 1080p resolution, it stores the file in *.3gp format.n5.Only 5-point multi touch but XOLO Qseries and even X500 gives a 10 point multi-touchnnnOther Deatils:nPhone is not manufactured by XOLO. The manufacturer is:"Huizhou BYD Electronic, China" - I am not sure who they are.nnany doubt pls post it.... I l help you with information..nBut I highly recommend this device. A great performer and its really a treat to serious gamers. nThis device can outperform XOLO Q700 with the performance
Actually i have been comparing both the models from the last 2-3 weeks and i have found both the devices very interesting.nActually i have recently sell my Xperia P which is none others than a brick of small battery, i have spend 25,500 on it's release and got only 6000+ Antutu score and a bad gaming experience.nAs i do gaming more than any other activity on phone I decided to choose between these two devices.nI had consult from the xolo online customer feedback that for gaming purpose which phone would be better? The person said as the X910 uses the same cpu which is used in some netbooks also, u can easily assume how powerful the cpu is even if it is compared to the cheap Quad Core of the Q800 and it can fail most of other cheap Quad Core cpu's found in Karbonn, Micromaxx etc.nMany people underestimate Intel Atom CPU's, but they are more powerful than the cheap Mediatek Quad Cores ( u can test cpu dependent tests for benchmarks) as far as the GPU is concerned X910 uses PowerVR SGX540 clocked at 400Mhz which is the most important thing in gaming even if the Q800 uses PowerVR SGX544 GPU it is clocked at 286Mhz (PC gamers will understand the most as the clock speed is more important than the 1-generation preceding tech.)nAfter the rigorous comparison of these two phones i have found X910 better for gaming .nIf u want a BSI sensor 8MP camera and a Quad-Core (Name Purpose) and a slightly larger screen 4.5" instead of 4.3" which doesn't make much difference yhen u can opt for Q800 but for gaming X910 all the way!!!! nI like both the phones , I am just choosing X910 for speciality.nnIf u don't believe then ask the xolo online customer or meet an employee of xolo and ask him!!!!!
RAM | 1 GB |
Processor | Intel Atom Z2460 |
Rear Camera | 5 MP |
Front Camera | 0.3 MP |
Battery | 2000 mAh |
Display | 4.3 inches (10.92 cm) |
Operating System | Android v4.0.4 (Ice Cream Sandwich) |
Chipset | Intel Atom Z2460 |
CPU | 1.6 GHz |
Graphics | PowerVR SGX 540 |
RAM | 1 GB |
Display Type | IPS LCD |
Screen Size | 4.3 inches (10.92 cm) |
Resolution | 540x960 px |
Pixel Density | 256 ppi |
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated) | 62.49 % |
Touch Screen | Yes, Capacitive Touchscreen, Multi-touch |
Height | 126 mm Compare Size |
Width | 64.7 mm |
Thickness | 10 mm |
Weight | 150 grams |
Colours | Black, White |
Main Camera | ||
Camera Setup | Single | |
Resolution |
5 MP, Primary Camera |
|
Autofocus | Yes | |
Flash | Yes, LED Flash | |
Image Resolution | 2592 x 1944 Pixels | |
Camera Features |
Digital Zoom Touch to focus |
|
Front Camera | ||
Camera Setup | Single | |
Resolution |
0.3 MP, Primary Camera |
Capacity | 2000 mAh |
Type | Li-ion |
Internal Memory | 4 GB |
Expandable Memory | Yes, Up to 32 GB |
SIM Slot(s) | Dual SIM, GSM+GSM |
Network Support | 5G Not Supported in India, 3G, 2G |
SIM 1 |
3G Bands: UMTS 1900 / 2100 / 850 / 900 MHz 2G Bands: GSM 1800 / 1900 / 850 / 900 MHz 3G Speed: HSDPA 21 Mbit/s ↓, HSUPA 11.5 Mbit/s ↑ GPRS: Available EDGE: Available
|
SIM 2 |
2G Bands: GSM 1800 / 1900 / 850 / 900 MHz
|
Wi-Fi | Yes, Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n) |
Bluetooth | Yes, v2.1 |
GPS | Yes with A-GPS |
USB Connectivity | USB 2.0, microUSB |
FM Radio | Yes |
Loudspeaker | Yes |
Audio Jack | 3.5 mm |
Other Sensors | Light sensor, Proximity sensor, Accelerometer, Compass |
Faster processor:
Quad core 1.2 GHz vs null 1.6 GHz
Smaller screen :
4.00 inches (10.16 cm) vs 4.30 inches (10.92 cm)
Lower battery capacity:
1700 mAH vs 2000 mAH
Larger screen:
5.00 inches (12.7 cm) vs 4.30 inches (10.92 cm)
Faster processor:
Dual core 1.4 GHz vs null 1.6 GHz
Higher primary camera resolution:
13 MP vs 5 MP
Larger screen:
4.50 inches (11.43 cm) vs 4.30 inches (10.92 cm)
Faster processor:
Quad core 1.2 GHz vs null 1.6 GHz
Higher battery capacity:
2400 mAH vs 2000 mAH
Higher primary camera resolution:
8 MP vs 5 MP
More internal memory:
16 GB vs 4 GB
Higher secondary camera resolution:
1.3 MP vs 0.3 MP
Larger screen:
5.00 inches (12.7 cm) vs 4.30 inches (10.92 cm)
Faster processor:
Quad core 1.2 GHz vs null 1.6 GHz
Higher primary camera resolution:
8 MP vs 5 MP
Larger screen:
4.50 inches (11.43 cm) vs 4.30 inches (10.92 cm)
Faster processor:
Quad core 1.2 GHz vs null 1.6 GHz
Higher primary camera resolution:
8 MP vs 5 MP
Rs 25,990