|
|
|
|
The Oppo R1 stands out as a stylish option in the mid-range dual-SIM smartphone arena
Jun 06 2014 By Deepak DhingraIf we get down to the micro level, the Oppo R1 has quite a few things going for it – stylish looks, a gorgeous display, a capable snapper and good battery life. When compared head-to-head with smartphones that are priced in the same range, it does lose out on pure specs though. The Gionee Elife E7 may be an exception anyway, but quite a few other devices offer better specs than the R1 at the same, or even lower cost. The anorexic Gionee Elife S5.5 is a more apples-to-apples comparison in terms of pricing and screen size, while a few others such as the Micromax Canvas Knight flaunt better specs for lower.That said, we’ve always emphasised that specs can’t be the only parameter when comparing devices, and quite a few other aspects such as design, build, software features etc need to be evaluated too. More importantly, it’s the real-world performance and usability that possibly matter the most. When looking at the bigger picture, the R1 stands out as a worthy mid-range option, especially if your checklist has ‘stylish’ and ‘dual-SIM 3G’ listed right at the very top.
Read Full ReviewSelling a phone with 24K and with only 1 GB RAM.. Common OPPO, at-least highlight your USP or compare your phone,
Plz no buy oppo slow speed and camera poor ram and store capacity low and prize very chip .do not this phone buy,
RAM | 1 GB |
Processor | MediaTek MT6582 |
Rear Camera | 8 MP |
Front Camera | 5 MP |
Battery | 2410 mAh |
Display | 5.0 inches (12.7 cm) |
Launch Date | December 24, 2013 (Official) |
Operating System | Android v4.2.2 (Jelly Bean) |
Chipset | MediaTek MT6582 |
CPU | Quad core, 1.3 GHz, Cortex A7 |
Graphics | Mali-400 MP2 |
RAM |
1 GB
Good
|
Display Type | IPS LCD |
Screen Size | 5.0 inches (12.7 cm) |
Resolution | 720x1280 px (HD) |
Pixel Density |
294 ppi
Very Good
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated) | 68.44 % |
Screen Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass |
Touch Screen | Yes, Capacitive Touchscreen, Multi-touch |
Height | 142.7 mm Compare Size |
Width | 70.4 mm |
Thickness |
7.1 mm
Excellent
|
Weight |
141 grams
Very Good
|
Colours | White |
Main Camera | ||
Camera Setup | Single | |
Resolution |
8 MP f/2.0, Primary Camera |
|
Sensor | CMOS image sensor | |
Autofocus | Yes | |
Flash | Yes, LED Flash | |
Image Resolution | 3264 x 2448 Pixels | |
Shooting Modes | Burst mode | |
Camera Features |
Face detection Touch to focus |
|
Video Recording | 1920x1080 @ 30 fps | |
Front Camera | ||
Camera Setup | Single | |
Resolution |
5 MP, Primary Camera |
Capacity | 2410 mAh |
Type | Li-ion |
Internal Memory |
16 GB
Very Good
|
Expandable Memory | No |
SIM Slot(s) | Dual SIM, GSM+GSM |
SIM Size | SIM1: Micro |
Network Support | 5G Not Supported in India, 3G, 2G |
SIM 1 |
3G Bands: UMTS 2100 MHz 2G Bands: GSM 1800 / 1900 / 850 / 900 MHz GPRS: Available EDGE: Available
|
SIM 2 |
2G Bands: GSM 1800 / 1900 / 850 / 900 MHz
|
Wi-Fi | Yes, Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n) |
Wi-Fi Features | Wi-Fi Direct |
Bluetooth | Yes, v2.1 |
GPS | Yes with A-GPS |
USB Connectivity | microUSB 2.0 |
FM Radio | Yes, RDS, Stereo FM |
Loudspeaker | Yes |
Audio Jack | 3.5 mm |
Other Sensors | Light sensor, Proximity sensor, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope |
Smaller screen :
4.00 inches (10.16 cm) vs 5.00 inches (12.7 cm)
Slower processor:
Quad core 1.2 GHz vs Quad core 1.3 GHz
Lower primary camera resolution:
5 MP vs 8 MP
More RAM:
512 MB vs 1 GB
Lesser weight:
130 grams vs 141 grams
Smaller screen :
4.50 inches (11.43 cm) vs 5.00 inches (12.7 cm)
Smaller screen :
4.30 inches (10.92 cm) vs 5.00 inches (12.7 cm)
Slower processor:
Quad core 1.2 GHz vs Quad core 1.3 GHz
Lower primary camera resolution:
5 MP vs 8 MP
Lesser weight:
139 grams vs 141 grams
Smaller screen :
4.30 inches (10.92 cm) vs 5.00 inches (12.7 cm)
Lower primary camera resolution:
5 MP vs 8 MP
Larger screen:
5.90 inches (14.99 cm) vs 5.00 inches (12.7 cm)
Faster processor:
Quad core 1.7 GHz vs Quad core 1.3 GHz
More RAM:
2 GB vs 1 GB
Lesser weight:
128 grams vs 141 grams
Smaller screen :
4.70 inches (11.94 cm) vs 5.00 inches (12.7 cm)
Lower battery capacity:
2000 mAH vs 2410 mAH
Rs 23,999