Apple A16 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 2500

Based on benchmark performance, Samsung Exynos 2500 achieves a higher total AnTuTu score of 1,515,751 (tested by 91Mobiles), compared to Apple A16 Bionic's 1,302,867 (tested by 91Mobiles), making Samsung Exynos 2500 the more powerful processor.

Apple A16 Bionic

Samsung Exynos 2500

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

Sep, 2022

Jun, 2025

CPU

Hexa Core

(3.46 GHz, Dual Core + 2.02 GHz, Quad core)

Deca Core

(3.3 GHz, Single Core + 2.74 GHz, Dual core + 2.36 GHz, Penta Core + 1.8 GHz, Dual core)

Process Node

4 nm

3 nm

GPU

Apple A16 GPU

Xclipse 950

Memory Type

LPDDR5

LPDDR5X

AnTuTu Score

1,302,867

View Benchmark Details

1,515,751

View Benchmark Details

Geekbench Score

2,398/5,285

View Benchmark Details

2,064/7,609

View Benchmark Details

Phones Powered by These SoCs

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

Score: 945,794

₹134,900

Samsung Galaxy S26 FE

Score: N/A

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7

Score: 1,515,751

₹109,999

Benchmark

AnTuTu (The higher, the better)

AnTuTu measures CPU, GPU, memory and overall performance in different scenarios

Apple A16 Bionic 1,302,867

View Benchmark Details

Samsung Exynos 2500 1,515,751

View Benchmark Details

CPU

322,518

379,701

GPU

353,283

529,745

Memory

310,155

360,939

316,911

245,366

Geekbench (The higher, the better)

The Geekbench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance

Geekbench Single Core

Apple A16 Bionic 2,398

View Benchmark Details

Samsung Exynos 2500 2,064

View Benchmark Details

Geekbench Multi Core

Apple A16 Bionic 5,285

View Benchmark Details

Samsung Exynos 2500 7,609

View Benchmark Details

Benchmark Screenshots

AnTuTu Score:

General

SoC Brand

Apple

Samsung

Title

Apple A16 Bionic

Samsung Exynos 2500

Model No

APL1W10

S5E9955

Manufacturing

TSMC

Samsung

CPU

Total Cores

Hexa Core

Deca Core

CPU

Hexa Core (3.46 GHz, Dual Core, Everest + 2.02 GHz, Quad core, Sawtooth)

Deca Core (3.3 GHz, Single Core, Cortex X925 + 2.74 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A725 + 2.36 GHz, Penta Core, Cortex A725 + 1.8 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A520)

Architecture (The higher, the better)

64 bit

Process Node

4 nm

3 nm

Instruction Set

ARMv8.6-A

ARMv9.2-A

L1 Cache

256 KB

128 KB

L2 Cache

16 MB

3 MB

L3 Cache

N/A

16 MB

GPU

Apple A16 GPU

Xclipse 950

GPU Clock speed

1.398 GHz

999 MHz

Pipelines

Shading Units

128

Total Shaders

640

1024

FLOPS

1789.4 Gigaflops

4091.9 Gigaflops

Vulkan Version

N/A

1.4

OpenCL Version

N/A

3.0 FP

DirectX Version

N/A

12.1

AI

NPU

Neural Engine

N/A

Memory

Memory Type

LPDDR5

LPDDR5X

Memory Speed

3.2 GHz

4.8 GHz

Bus

4x16 Bit

Memory Max bandwidth

51.2 Gb/s

76.8 Gb/s

Memory Max size

6 GB

24 GB

Storage Type

NVMe

UFS 4.0

Camera

Max Camera Sensor Supported

48 MP

320 MP

Max Video Capture Resolution

UHD @ 60 FPS

8K @ 30 FPS

Display

Max On-Device Display Resolution

N/A

UHD

Max Refresh Rate

N/A

120 Hz

Multimedia

Video Playback Resolution

UHD @ 60 FPS

8K @ 60 FPS

Video Codecs

H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9

H.264 (AVC), H.265 (HEVC), AV1, VP9

Audio Codecs

AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV

Connectivity

Modem Name

N/A	Exynos 5400

5G Support

Yes

Peak Download Speed

Up to 7500 Mbps

Up to 12100 Mbps

Peak Upload Speed

Up to 3500 Mbps

Up to 3670 Mbps

Wi-Fi Version

Wi-Fi Standard

a, ax, b, g, n, n 5GHz

ac, ax, b, be, g, n, n 5GHz

Bluetooth Version

5.3

5.4

Navigation

BeiDou, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, QZSS

BeiDou, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, NavIC, QZSS

User Feedback

Related Comparisons

Apple A16 Bionic

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2

Apple A16 Bionic

Google Tensor G5

Apple A16 Bionic

Apple A17 Pro

Apple A16 Bionic

Google Tensor G4

Apple A16 Bionic

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1

Samsung Exynos 2500

Apple A18 Pro

Samsung Exynos 2500

Samsung Exynos 2400

Samsung Exynos 2500

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2

Samsung Exynos 2500

Google Tensor G5

Samsung Exynos 2500

Apple A17 Pro