Samsung Exynos 2500 vs Apple A16 Bionic

Based on benchmark performance, Samsung Exynos 2500 achieves a higher total AnTuTu score of 1,515,751 (tested by 91Mobiles), compared to Apple A16 Bionic's 1,302,867 (tested by 91Mobiles), making Samsung Exynos 2500 the more powerful processor.

Samsung Exynos 2500

Apple A16 Bionic

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

Jun, 2025

Sep, 2022

CPU

Deca Core

(3.3 GHz, Single Core + 2.74 GHz, Dual core + 2.36 GHz, Penta Core + 1.8 GHz, Dual core)

Hexa Core

(3.46 GHz, Dual Core + 2.02 GHz, Quad core)

Process Node

3 nm

4 nm

GPU

Xclipse 950

Apple A16 GPU

Memory Type

LPDDR5X

LPDDR5

AnTuTu Score

1,515,751

View Benchmark Details

1,302,867

View Benchmark Details

Geekbench Score

2,064/7,609

View Benchmark Details

2,398/5,285

View Benchmark Details

Phones Powered by These SoCs

Samsung Galaxy S26 FE

Score: N/A

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

Score: 945,794

₹134,900

Benchmark

AnTuTu (The higher, the better)

AnTuTu measures CPU, GPU, memory and overall performance in different scenarios

Samsung Exynos 2500 1,515,751

View Benchmark Details

Apple A16 Bionic 1,302,867

View Benchmark Details

CPU

379,701

322,518

GPU

529,745

353,283

Memory

360,939

310,155

245,366

316,911

Geekbench (The higher, the better)

The Geekbench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance

Geekbench Single Core

Samsung Exynos 2500 2,064

View Benchmark Details

Apple A16 Bionic 2,398

View Benchmark Details

Geekbench Multi Core

Samsung Exynos 2500 7,609

View Benchmark Details

Apple A16 Bionic 5,285

View Benchmark Details

Benchmark Screenshots

AnTuTu Score:

General

SoC Brand

Samsung

Apple

Title

Samsung Exynos 2500

Apple A16 Bionic

Model No

S5E9955

APL1W10

Manufacturing

Samsung

TSMC

CPU

Total Cores

Deca Core

Hexa Core

CPU

Deca Core (3.3 GHz, Single Core, Cortex X925 + 2.74 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A725 + 2.36 GHz, Penta Core, Cortex A725 + 1.8 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A520)

Hexa Core (3.46 GHz, Dual Core, Everest + 2.02 GHz, Quad core, Sawtooth)

Architecture (The higher, the better)

64 bit

Process Node

3 nm

4 nm

Instruction Set

ARMv9.2-A

ARMv8.6-A

L1 Cache

128 KB

256 KB

L2 Cache

3 MB

16 MB

L3 Cache

16 MB

N/A

GPU

Xclipse 950

Apple A16 GPU

GPU Clock speed

999 MHz

1.398 GHz

Pipelines

Shading Units

128

Total Shaders

1024

640

FLOPS

4091.9 Gigaflops

1789.4 Gigaflops

Vulkan Version

1.4

N/A

OpenCL Version

3.0 FP

N/A

DirectX Version

12.1

N/A

AI

NPU

N/A	Neural Engine

Memory

Memory Type

LPDDR5X

LPDDR5

Memory Speed

4.8 GHz

3.2 GHz

Bus

4x16 Bit

Memory Max bandwidth

76.8 Gb/s

51.2 Gb/s

Memory Max size

24 GB

6 GB

Storage Type

UFS 4.0

NVMe

Camera

Max Camera Sensor Supported

320 MP

48 MP

Max Video Capture Resolution

8K @ 30 FPS

UHD @ 60 FPS

Display

Max On-Device Display Resolution

UHD

N/A

Max Refresh Rate

120 Hz

N/A

Multimedia

Video Playback Resolution

8K @ 60 FPS

UHD @ 60 FPS

Video Codecs

H.264 (AVC), H.265 (HEVC), AV1, VP9

H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9

Audio Codecs

AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV

Connectivity

Modem Name

Exynos 5400

N/A

5G Support

Yes

Peak Download Speed

Up to 12100 Mbps

Up to 7500 Mbps

Peak Upload Speed

Up to 3670 Mbps

Up to 3500 Mbps

Wi-Fi Version

Wi-Fi Standard

ac, ax, b, be, g, n, n 5GHz

a, ax, b, g, n, n 5GHz

Bluetooth Version

5.4

5.3

Navigation

BeiDou, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, NavIC, QZSS

BeiDou, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, QZSS

User Feedback

Related Comparisons

Samsung Exynos 2500

Apple A18 Pro

Samsung Exynos 2500

Samsung Exynos 2400

Samsung Exynos 2500

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2

Samsung Exynos 2500

Google Tensor G5

Samsung Exynos 2500

Apple A17 Pro

Apple A16 Bionic

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2

Apple A16 Bionic

Google Tensor G5

Apple A16 Bionic

Apple A17 Pro

Apple A16 Bionic

Google Tensor G4

Apple A16 Bionic

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1