|
78%
Xiaomi Redmi K20
₹22,999
(Out of Stock)
|
76%
Motorola One Vision
₹11,987
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Xiaomi Redmi K20 vs Motorola One Vision
Comparing the Xiaomi Redmi K20 vs Motorola One Vision across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Xiaomi Redmi K20 scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 6,793, while Motorola One Vision scores 5,333, making Xiaomi Redmi K20 the better performer.
Display: Xiaomi Redmi K20 offers a screen size of 6.39 inches, while Motorola One Vision offers 6.3 inches, making Xiaomi Redmi K20 the larger display of the two. Xiaomi Redmi K20 features a AMOLED display compared to Motorola One Vision's IPS LCD, making Xiaomi Redmi K20 the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Both Xiaomi Redmi K20 and Motorola One Vision feature a 48 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Motorola One Vision offers a higher front camera resolution with 25 MP, while Xiaomi Redmi K20 offers 20 MP, making Motorola One Vision better for front camera photography.
Battery: Xiaomi Redmi K20 delivers longer battery life with 13h 38m, while Motorola One Vision delivers 12h 20m, making Xiaomi Redmi K20 the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Xiaomi Redmi K20 offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while Motorola One Vision offers 128 GB, making Xiaomi Redmi K20 the better option for storage.
Expert Review: The editorial team rates both Xiaomi Redmi K20 and Motorola One Vision equally at 7.
User Rating: Xiaomi Redmi K20 receives a higher user rating of 4.5, while Motorola One Vision has a rating of 4.2.
|
✕
Xiaomi Redmi K20
₹22,999
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
Motorola One Vision
₹11,987
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
78%
|
76%
|
Release Date
|
22 Jul, 2019
|
27 Jun, 2019
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 730
|
Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 9609
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.2 GHz)
|
|
6 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.39 inches (16.23 cm)
|
6.3 inches (16 cm)
|
|
AMOLED
|
IPS LCD
|
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2520 px (FHD+)
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
13 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
5 MP
Depth Camera
|
|
8 MP
Telephoto Camera (upto 2x Optical Zoom)
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
20 MP
|
25 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
4000 mAh
|
3500 mAh
|
|
18W Quick Charging
|
15W Turbo Power Charging
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
UFS 2.1
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.5/5
(53,168 ratings)
|
4.2/5
(12,076 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
209,539
AnTuTu Score
|
149,177
AnTuTu Score
|
|
13h 38m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
12h 20m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Jul 22, 2019
(Official)
|
Jun 27, 2019
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Custom UI
|
MIUI
|
N/A
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
|
Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 9609
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.2 GHz, Dual core, Kryo 470 1.8 GHz, Hexa Core, Kryo 470 |
Octa core
2.2 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A73 1.6 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A53 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
8 nm
|
N/A
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 618
|
Mali-G72 MP3
|
RAM
|
6 GB
|
4 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
209,539
|
149,177
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
15.0 s
|
17.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
12.0 %
|
N/A
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
22.4 %
|
N/A
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Best In Class
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
AMOLED
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.39 inches (16.23 cm)
|
6.3 inches (16 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2520 px (FHD+)
|
Aspect Ratio
|
19.5:9
|
21:9
|
Pixel Density
|
403 ppi
|
435 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
85.9 %
|
81.52 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v5
|
Corning Gorilla Glass
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
HDR 10 / HDR+ Support
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
91.9 %
|
N/A
|
Design
Height
|
156.7 mm
|
160.1 mm
|
Width
|
74.3 mm
|
71.2 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.8 mm
|
8.7 mm
|
Weight
|
191 grams
|
180 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Gorilla Glass
|
Back: Mineral Glass
|
Water Resistance
|
N/A
|
Yes Splash proof IP52
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
48 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.751/2" sensor size IMX586 Exmor-RS CMOS Sensor 0.8µm pixel size |
48 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.7S5KGM1 ISOCELL Plus 1.6µm pixel size |
|
13 MP
f/2.4 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1/3" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
5 MP
f/2.2 Depth Camera |
|
8 MP
f/2.4 Telephoto Camera1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
N/A
|
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Yes
|
OIS
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes Dual LED Flash
|
Yes Dual LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Burst mode |
Camera Features
|
Auto Flash
Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
4k @30 fps
Full HD @60 fps HD @120 fps |
4k @30 fps
Full HD @60 fps |
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
20 MP
f/2.2 Primary Camera1/3.4" sensor size 0.8µm pixel size |
25 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera0.9µm pixel size |
Camera Type
|
Pop-Up
|
N/A
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Full HD @30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
4000 mAh
|
3500 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-Polymer
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 18W Quick Charging v3.0
|
Yes 15W Turbo Power Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
13h 38m
|
12h 20m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
1h 38m 18s
|
2h 5m 3s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.1
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
No
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 1.07 W/kg Body: 0.723 W/kg
|
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac) MIMO
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
On-screen
|
Rear
|
Fingerprint Sensor Type
|
Optical
|
N/A
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|