Movie
Disclaimer: All content and media belong to original content streaming platforms/owners like Netflix, Disney+ Hotstar, Amazon Prime Videos, JioCinema, SonyLIV etc. 91mobiles entertainment does not claim any rights to the content and only aggregate the content along with the service providers links.
2005 | Nickolas
Box Office Collection 376,612 USD
This documentary film was made and first released about four years after its source book of the same "The Hunting of the President" name by Gene Lyons and Joe Conason had been first published in the year 2000.
The full title of this documentary film's source 2000 book by Gene Lyons and Joe Conason is "The Hunting of the President: The Ten Year Campaign to Destroy Bill and Hillary Clinton" [See: Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton].
This documentary feature film was selected to premiere at the Sundance Film Festival in 2004.
This feature documentary's opening title cards state: "January 21, 1999" and "Washington D.C.".
This film's opening prologue states: "This motion picture is based on the book 'The Hunting of the President: The Ten Year Campaign to Destroy Bill and Hillary Clinton' by Joe Conason and Gene Lyons" [See: Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton].
"Robert Bennett: And I remember George Stephanopoulos coming into the Oval Office not once but two or three times and saying "Mr. President you have GOT to get into this meeting." It was surreal. I was taking the time of the President of the United States during an international emergency, talking with him about the Paula Jones case."
"Sidney Blumenthal: There was a sense among a certain social set in Washington, that Clinton was not their kind of person. He gave a little talk at a party that was given to welcome him to town when he was President Elect, and he noted that those who came to Washington weren't there to serve themselves, and shouldn't be. But, they were there to serve the people who sent them. Now, some of those at that party thought that he was criticizing them. And they didn't understand that he wasn't talking about them or parties, he was talking about the White House and the Congress. He was making a political statement, but this was a threat to the status system in Washington. And those who chose to accept it as such chose to reject Clinton as an interloper and outsider and to stigmatize him as white trash and here he is someone who is deeply conciliatory and moderate in his nature and yet arouses intense opposition - what's the source of the paradox. It has to do with the entrenched power that he's confronting and trying to change."
