|
|
|
|
all other mobiles with better specs are available much cheaper prices, this comp is giving 100 years old specs for 10 k, really disappointed with price????????????
Oppo's high end devices like Find7,Find7a,Oppo N1 etc are excellent devices to own. Unfortunately that's not the case with the low end budget devices from them.nnLook at the specs of this device, and compare it to a device selling for a few thousands less - Micromax Canvas Unite2. This only has a dual core processor, a 1.3Ghz Mediatek processor and Android Jellybean based Color OS 1.0 runs the show,while Unite 2 comes with a 1.3Ghz Quadcore and Stock Android Kitkat out of the box. At the same price as this device ships ie Rs. 10,990 (as of this writing) you can get Hexacore or even some 1.4Ghz octacore powered devices with better display,camera and overall performance. Xiaomi 1S also comes with far better specs for half the price.nnDual core 1.3Ghz with 1GB ram is OK, you can do most of your day to day tasks without much issues. This is running Color OS based on Android 4.2 Jellybean, a custom Android built by Oppo which adds a lot of gimmicks and features. I would have loved this coming with stock Android Kitkat as it offers better performance. Oppo really needs to up their game in order to get a strong foothold in the indian budget phone market. They need to price this a lot lesser, in 8K to get some ppl to even consider buying.
RAM | 1 GB |
Processor | MediaTek MT6572 |
Rear Camera | 5 MP |
Front Camera | 2 MP |
Battery | 1900 mAh |
Display | 4.5 inches (11.43 cm) |
Operating System | Android v4.2 (Jelly Bean) |
Chipset | MediaTek MT6572 |
CPU | Dual core, 1.3 GHz, Cortex A7 |
Graphics | Mali-400 MP |
RAM |
1 GB
Good
|
Display Type | IPS LCD |
Screen Size | 4.5 inches (11.43 cm) |
Resolution | 480x854 px |
Pixel Density |
218 ppi
Poor
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated) | 64.23 % |
Touch Screen | Yes, Capacitive Touchscreen, Multi-touch |
Height | 132 mm Compare Size |
Width | 65.8 mm |
Thickness |
8.2 mm
Very Good
|
Weight |
128 grams
Very Good
|
Colours | White |
Main Camera | ||
Camera Setup | Single | |
Resolution |
5 MP, Primary Camera |
|
Autofocus | Yes | |
Flash | Yes, LED Flash | |
Image Resolution | 2592 x 1944 Pixels | |
Camera Features | Digital Zoom | |
Front Camera | ||
Camera Setup | Single | |
Resolution |
2 MP, Primary Camera |
Capacity | 1900 mAh |
Type | Li-ion |
Internal Memory |
4 GB
Below Average
|
Expandable Memory | Yes, Up to 32 GB |
SIM Slot(s) | Dual SIM, GSM+GSM |
Network Support | 5G Not Supported in India, 3G, 2G |
SIM 1 |
3G Bands: UMTS 2100 MHz 2G Bands: GSM 1800 / 1900 / 850 / 900 MHz GPRS: Available EDGE: Available
|
SIM 2 |
2G Bands: GSM 1800 / 1900 / 850 / 900 MHz
|
Wi-Fi | Yes, Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n) |
Wi-Fi Features | Wi-Fi Direct, Mobile Hotspot |
Bluetooth | Yes, v2.1 |
GPS | Yes with A-GPS |
USB Connectivity | microUSB 2.0 |
Loudspeaker | Yes |
Audio Jack | 3.5 mm |
Other Sensors | Light sensor, Proximity sensor, Accelerometer |
More RAM:
512 MB vs 1 GB
Lesser SIM card slots:
1 vs 2
More thickness:
9.2 mm vs 8.2 mm
Larger screen:
4.70 inches (11.94 cm) vs 4.50 inches (11.43 cm)
Faster processor:
Quad core 1.3 GHz vs Dual core 1.3 GHz
Higher primary camera resolution:
8 MP vs 5 MP
Larger screen:
5.00 inches (12.7 cm) vs 4.50 inches (11.43 cm)
More RAM:
512 MB vs 1 GB
Higher battery capacity:
2500 mAH vs 1900 mAH
Larger screen:
4.70 inches (11.94 cm) vs 4.50 inches (11.43 cm)
Faster processor:
Quad core 1.3 GHz vs Dual core 1.3 GHz
Higher pixel density:
234 ppi vs 218 ppi
Faster processor:
Quad core 1.2 GHz vs Dual core 1.3 GHz
More RAM:
768 MB vs 1 GB
Higher battery capacity:
2000 mAH vs 1900 mAH
Larger screen:
4.70 inches (11.94 cm) vs 4.50 inches (11.43 cm)
Faster processor:
Quad core 1.6 GHz vs Dual core 1.3 GHz
Higher primary camera resolution:
8 MP vs 5 MP
Rs 25,990