|
|
|
|
Check out our review of the most affordable phone with under-display fingerprint sensor!
Apr 21 2019 By Shekhar ThakranThe OPPO K1 is one of those all-rounder phones that get many things right. The handset brings along an AMOLED display panel and an under-display fingerprint sensor at an extremely competitive price. However, with the availability of Redmi Note 7 Pro (review) at a lower price, it becomes hard for us to recommend the OPPO offering over Xiaomi`s. The Redmi Note 7 Pro, in comparison, comes with a better chipset, larger battery capacity, and better camera performance, all at Rs 14,999. Having said that, OPPO`s handset still retains the novelty factor that comes with being the most affordable offering with an under-display fingerprint sensor. If you also prefer AMOLED panel over an IPS one, things might swing in favour of OPPO K1 for you. If you don`t want to buy either of these phones, there is also Honor Play (review), which is now available at an extremely attractive price of Rs 14,999.
Read Full ReviewThis phone is really good. Worth for money spend. Both the cameras are too good as compared with MI. Earlier I was a user of MI. I am waiting for Note 7. But this phones configuration make me to buy it. Guys try for a change.
The Qualcomm Snapdragon Days sale is now live on Flipkart and will continue until June 30th.
Jun 26 2019 By Sai KrishnaThe all new OPPO series is speculated to be an online-exclusive series of affordable smartphones with in-display fingerprint sensor.
Jan 29 2019 By Abhiman BiswasThe OPPO K1 is the debut of K-series from the brand and is expected to come as an more affordable alternative to the OPPO R17
Oct 08 2018 By Abhiman BiswasRAM | 4 GB |
Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8956 |
Rear Camera | 16 MP + 2 MP |
Front Camera | 25 MP |
Battery | 3600 mAh |
Display | 6.4 inches (16.26 cm) |
Launch Date | February 12, 2019 (Official) |
Operating System | Android v9.0 (Pie) |
Custom UI | ColorOS |
Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8956 |
CPU | Octa core (1.95 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 260 + 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 260) |
Architecture | 64 bit |
Fabrication | 14 nm |
Graphics | Adreno 512 |
RAM |
4 GB
Excellent
▾
|
RAM Type | LPDDR4X |
Display Type | AMOLED |
Screen Size | 6.4 inches (16.26 cm) |
Resolution | 1080x2340 px (FHD+) |
Aspect Ratio | 19.5:9 |
Pixel Density |
403 ppi
Best in Class
▾
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated) | 83.95 % |
Screen Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass v5 |
Bezel-less display | Yes with waterdrop notch |
Touch Screen | Yes, Capacitive Touchscreen, Multi-touch |
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand) | 91 % |
Height | 158.3 mm Compare Size |
Width | 75.5 mm |
Thickness |
7.4 mm
Very Good
▾
|
Weight |
156 grams
Good
▾
|
Build Material | Back: Plastic |
Colours | Astral Blue, Piano Black |
Main Camera | ||
Camera Setup | Dual | |
Resolution |
16 MP f/1.75, Primary Camera(2.8" sensor size, CMOS image sensor, 1.12µm pixel size)2 MP f/2.4, Depth Camera |
|
Autofocus | Yes | |
Flash | Yes, LED Flash | |
Image Resolution | 4616 x 3464 Pixels | |
Settings | Exposure compensation, ISO control | |
Shooting Modes |
Continuous Shooting High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Burst mode |
|
Camera Features |
2 x Digital Zoom Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
|
Video Recording | 3840x2160 @ 30 fps | |
Front Camera | ||
Camera Setup | Single | |
Resolution | 25 MP f/2.0, Primary Camera(CMOS, 0.9µm pixel size) | |
Flash | Yes, Screen flash | |
Video Recording | 1920x1080 @ 30 fps |
Capacity | 3600 mAh |
Type | Li-ion |
Removable | No |
USB Type-C | No |
Internal Memory |
64 GB
Best in Class
▾
|
Expandable Memory | Yes, Up to 256 GB |
User Available Storage | Up to 47.5 GB |
USB OTG | Yes |
Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 |
SIM Slot(s) | Dual SIM, GSM+GSM, Dual VoLTE |
SIM Size | SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano |
Network Support | 5G Not Supported in India, 4G Supported in India, 3G, 2G |
VoLTE | Yes |
SIM 1 |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41) / 1900(band 39) FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 850(band 18) / 850(band 19) / 800(band 20) / 850(band 26) 3G Bands: UMTS 1900 / 2100 / 850 / 900 MHz 2G Bands: GSM 1800 / 1900 / 850 / 900 MHz GPRS: Available EDGE: Available
|
SIM 2 |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41) / 1900(band 39) FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 850(band 19) / 800(band 20) / 850(band 26) 3G Bands: UMTS 1900 / 2100 / 850 / 900 MHz 2G Bands: GSM 1800 / 1900 / 850 / 900 MHz GPRS: Available EDGE: Available
|
SAR Value | Head: 0.278 W/kg, Body: 0.861 W/kg |
Wi-Fi | Yes, Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n) |
Wi-Fi Features | Mobile Hotspot |
Bluetooth | Yes, v5.0 |
GPS | Yes with A-GPS, Glonass |
USB Connectivity | Mass storage device, USB charging, microUSB 2.0 |
Loudspeaker | Yes |
Audio Jack | 3.5 mm |
Fingerprint Sensor | Yes |
Fingerprint Sensor Position | On-screen |
Fingerprint Sensor Type | Optical |
Other Sensors | Light sensor, Proximity sensor, Accelerometer, Gyroscope |
Higher primary camera resolution:
48 MP vs 16 MP
Higher battery capacity:
4000 mAH vs 3600 mAH
Higher pixel density:
409 ppi vs 403 ppi
Smaller screen :
6.30 inches (16 cm) vs 6.40 inches (16.26 cm)
Slower processor:
Dual core 2.0 GHz vs Quad core 1.95 GHz
Lower secondary camera resolution:
13 MP vs 25 MP
More thickness:
8.1 mm vs 7.4 mm
More weight:
186 grams vs 156 grams
Common Features
Higher battery capacity:
5000 mAH vs 3600 mAH
More expandable memory:
512 GB vs 256 GB
Slower processor:
Dual core 1.8 GHz vs Quad core 1.95 GHz
Lower primary camera resolution:
13 MP vs 16 MP
Lower pixel density:
394 ppi vs 403 ppi
Lower secondary camera resolution:
16 MP vs 25 MP
More thickness:
8.5 mm vs 7.4 mm
More weight:
174 grams vs 156 grams
Common Features
Faster processor:
Quad core 2.0 GHz vs Quad core 1.95 GHz
More RAM:
6 GB vs 4 GB
Higher pixel density:
409 ppi vs 403 ppi
Smaller screen :
6.30 inches (16 cm) vs 6.40 inches (16.26 cm)
Lower battery capacity:
3500 mAH vs 3600 mAH
More thickness:
8 mm vs 7.4 mm
More weight:
169 grams vs 156 grams
Common Features
Higher battery capacity:
4045 mAH vs 3600 mAH
Higher pixel density:
409 ppi vs 403 ppi
Smaller screen :
6.30 inches (16 cm) vs 6.40 inches (16.26 cm)
Slower processor:
Dual core 2.2 GHz vs Quad core 1.95 GHz
More thickness:
8.3 mm vs 7.4 mm
More weight:
172 grams vs 156 grams
Common Features
Faster processor:
Quad core 2.3 GHz vs Quad core 1.95 GHz
Higher primary camera resolution:
25 MP vs 16 MP
Higher battery capacity:
4000 mAH vs 3600 mAH
More expandable memory:
512 GB vs 256 GB
More thickness:
7.7 mm vs 7.4 mm
More weight:
166 grams vs 156 grams
Common Features
Faster processor:
Quad core 2.0 GHz vs Quad core 1.95 GHz
More RAM:
6 GB vs 4 GB
Smaller screen :
6.30 inches (16 cm) vs 6.40 inches (16.26 cm)
Lower battery capacity:
3315 mAH vs 3600 mAH
Lower pixel density:
400 ppi vs 403 ppi
More thickness:
8.1 mm vs 7.4 mm
More weight:
163.7 grams vs 156 grams
Common Features
Rs. 31,948
Home | Privacy | Sitemap | About Us | Contact Us | Visitor Agreement | Terms & Conditions | 91mobiles Hindi | Feedback | 91mobiles Indonesia
© 91digital web private limited. All Rights Reserved.